Get real.
No one comes up to you and asks if they might touch your 626.
There is a lot of truth in that, however ........... there are other reasons that one might be approached and asked a question or given a comment. That might be "What kind of shells are you using, to kill birds like that?" or "I can't believe you're shooting a .410." or "I didn't see you miss today".
I've been around shooters/hunters all my life. I've shot with the very wealthy and I've hunted with the humble. Double barrel Purdeys and single barrel Iver Johnsons. I've seen people in awe of an expensive shotgun and I've seen people in awe of the shooting ability of a man with a worn out Parker with the forend held on with black electrical tape.
What's my point? Everybody needs to assess their desires. Do you want to be remembered because you own a London best, or because you were a far above average shot? I'm not saying they are mutually exclusive, but the hard truth is that I can count the number of men I have known in my life that were "best shots", and also shot "best guns", on one hand ......... and have fingers left over. I don't have enough fingers and toes to count the number who wanted to impress with their fine guns but couldn't shoot them worth a continental damn. And, I know a considerable number of men who can shoot game with the best, but could care less what kind of guns they're using.
What do I respect the most, the ability of the man ............. or the gun? Without a doubt it is the ability of the man. And, just for the record .........I prefer hunting with the humble.
SRH