April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
5 members (Lloyd3, SKB, Mike Harrell, 2 invisible), 754 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,445
Posts544,858
Members14,406
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753
he is Brian not Bill

look at the antique FAQs on the safe act site

https://safeact.ny.gov/gun-owners


if you ask any government employee if they regulate something - the answer is invariably yes - correctly or not

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 666
Likes: 45
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 666
Likes: 45
I remember reading this a while ago, I think the questions is whether or not you want to expend the countless sums on litigating second amendment rights:

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/broo...rticle-1.426098

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,739
Likes: 97
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,739
Likes: 97
federal law is pretty clear...if it was made prior to 1899, it is an antique...however, many responsible ffl dealers (myself included) are reluctant to ship cartridge firing firearms to unknown individuals and prefer to utilize the services of a local ffl dealer for background check, in an effort to keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of dangerous people...

Last edited by ed good; 02/25/17 10:02 PM.

keep it simple and keep it safe...
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&a...+of+antique.gun

As I said, antique long guns are actually NOT strictly acknowledged. As such, they fall under normal long gun transfer rules. Theres no issue with OWNING them...where is gets dicey is people thinking they are free to ship and receive them without FFL transfer.

As for the SAFE Act website, be VERY careful assuming the quick shot responses they make there are correct. The number of items that have "evolved" since the law was hastily passed is incredible. You need to rest of what the legal code actually says...NOT some bureaucrat interpretation of what it means. That wont hold up in court.

My point here is...the whole issue is actually a grey area. It could well depend upon a given judge as to which way he interprets.

- Nudge

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,739
Likes: 97
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,739
Likes: 97
when in doubt...insist on a background check...that way one will sleep better...


keep it simple and keep it safe...
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
Ed Good,

This isnt about the Federal law, which is clear.

As for your taking it upon yourself to decide your judgement supercedes the law...what if my pharmacist decided they didnt want to give me my medication because they dont know me? Just because someone is not known to you, doesnt mean they arent entitled to a presumption of good character.

Do you think small town cops should be allowed to kick strangers out of town? Just because they dont know them? "Oh I dont know, better just be on the safenside and boot them from the roadside cafe and send them on their way."

Laws exist to set a fair baseline of safety. Anything interpretive betond this is boumd to be abused, precisely because good judgement isnt known to be any thicker with gun dealers...than with gun buyers.

BTW, gun control people are always trying to get the upper hand by way of oh-so-reasonable means of nullifying people's right. This has brought us such creative nuggets as the last adminstration attempting to curtail the gun rights of returning soldiers. Oh and dont forget waiting periods. Those are so "reasonable." Nope, theyre just as likely to keep.the.gun out of a victims hand, as it is the aggressor.

- Nudge

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 445
Likes: 47
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 445
Likes: 47
Originally Posted By: Nudge

As I said, antique long guns are actually NOT strictly acknowledged. As such, they fall under normal long gun transfer rules. Theres no issue with OWNING them...where is gets dicey is people thinking they are free to ship and receive them without FFL transfer.


You are not correct as it relates to FEDERAL law - your STATE law may vary. Antique firearms are transferable to individuals without an FFL.

Here's what ATF says about antique firearms - even FELONS can have them - the full document is here - https://www.atf.gov/file/61721/download - short version below (emphasis mine):

"1. Can a person prohibited by law from possessing a firearm acquire and use a black powder
muzzle loading firearm?
The Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) prohibits felons and certain other persons from possessing or
receiving firearms and ammunition (“prohibited persons”). These categories can be found at 18
U.S.C. § 922(g) and (n) in http://atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf.
However, Federal law does not prohibit these persons from possessing or receiving an antique
firearm. The term “antique firearm” means any firearm (including any firearm with a matchlock,
flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898
. The
definition includes any replica of an antique firearm if it is not designed or redesigned for using
rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition, or uses rimfire or conventional centerfire
ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the United States, and which is not readily available
in ordinary channels of commercial trade.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355
Likes: 10
FlyChamps,

This whole sidebar conversation is about NY State law...not Federal.

I never intended to hyjack the OP, but it appears I.may have.

- Nudge

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 352
Likes: 33
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 352
Likes: 33
I've dealt with some auction houses that require the gun to go through a FFL because they can not definitively prove that the gun was made prior to 1898 due an absence of records that have disappeared as has happened to many English makers.

I can't blame an individual seller or auction house that chooses to CYA rather then risk having a chat with local or Federal law enforcement.


I have become addicted to English hammered shotguns to the detriment of my wallet.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 159
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 159
Originally Posted By: Chantry
I've dealt with some auction houses that require the gun to go through a FFL because they can not definitively prove that the gun was made prior to 1898 due an absence of records that have disappeared as has happened to many English makers.


Unfortunately that happens and as you say they can't be blamed. Not much to be done in that case other than proceed through the full FFL process. With regards to records there are occassional guns I don't pursue because I can't find records that would "prove" to the ATF or other parties the age of the gun. Generally I find that if the maker is listed in Brown's Vol. 1 - 3 , then I've been able to get either an ATF sign off or import as an antique. I've found ATF also accepts published articles on gunmakers covering model ages. Not much help if a third party is insistent but it might be helfpful for those that can be persuaded.

As an aside, permitting and antique/curio&relics designation and permits are is something the exporters I use in the UK generally check as they seem to require it be confirmed as part of their export permitting regardless of the designation in the UK. A decade ago some would just ship an antique direct but no longer. Paperwork is now required but in the long term is just a hassle not a problem. Funny to sign off on official declarations that I will not use the guns in the assembly of nuclear weapons, as if anyone smuggling such material would be honest, but that's the way it is. Oddities occur for instance with the purchase of damascus barrels which are still handled as "firearms" in the UK with the requisite RFD transfers required.

Jeremy

Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.064s Queries: 36 (0.039s) Memory: 0.8552 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-20 16:08:11 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS