S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,532
Posts545,946
Members14,420
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2 |
Gents, I would be interested in anything you could tell me about this gun. Who may have made it, an idea of when and an approximate value in your neck of the woods. It has already been suggested it's a Scott gun, if so what sort of premium would you expect to pay simply for the name? I don't want to start a debate as to whether you should pay a premium, rather what you would expect the market would dictate. For the purpose of the exercise we assume the gun is free from defect and the internals are in the same order as the exterior. Thanks, GDU.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,964 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,964 Likes: 89 |
Greg, I doubt it is a Scott since it has what appears to be a patent use number, 29,229. I'm not aware of Scott built guns having a use number on them. The licensing would be for the Scott top lever. It also has the Purdey under bolt, which Scott also licensed to all makers outside of London.
Nicely restored gun. I imagine a dealer would add 50% to 100% to his asking price over a similar less prestigious name. Hard to say and I hope others more knowledgeable will chime in. Would like to see more pictures.
When an old man dies a library burns to the ground. (Old African proverb)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96 |
Yes, it bears William Midleditch Scott's mark and the patent 2752 of 1865 refers to the top lever sometimes called a Scott Spindle. Don't think the number 29229 is anything to do with Hollands as that would be for the number sequence for the 'Royal' hammerless guns. The Scott sequence would put it at 1877; which is about right although the style of gun looks a little earlier. Do you have another number? Which would be a Holland number; maybe on the barrels or trigger guard. Could be that Scotts made the action and supplied it to Hollands or made the whole gun or the number is the patent use number making it the 29th. thousand or so made on that patent. A gun that I would be going over with a magnifying glass for little clues.
Beautiful gun and, in what appears to be, little used condition. Could do with a look at the Proof Marks on the barrels as a nitro re-proof would help the price up a bit although the action looks as if it is still black powder proof. Hollands should have more information as on the whole their records are mostly complete. Not going to hazard a value at this stage but good hammer guns are going for good prices in the U.K. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,745 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,745 Likes: 97 |
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,144 Likes: 202
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,144 Likes: 202 |
Wow, a round frame Holland and Holland. Am I correct in assuming that first teir round frame hammer guns of this type are a bit uncommon?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,639 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,639 Likes: 76 |
Champlin has one just like it for $8900
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,964 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,964 Likes: 89 |
Champlin has one just like it for $8900 Yes, but it has sleeved barrels which would lower the price considerably for me.
When an old man dies a library burns to the ground. (Old African proverb)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 227
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 227 |
I have the same "looking" Holland Hammer gun with ledger records and history, and is a " Royal". My barrels are sleeved. Serial number is 19832 and had steel as original barrels. Dated 1899.
Last edited by Condor; 01/14/17 04:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638 Likes: 2 |
So what tier do you think this gun is?
I rather suspect the case is not the original as it bears the date 1883 and I suspect the gun is older than that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 227
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 227 |
If your serial number is 6950... then it is 1881. There are gaps in sequences and some number sections may not have been used... see Dallas H&H book. The case may very well be the original case as the gun may not have left the shop, or case made for it , until two years later. Not unusual.
Last edited by Condor; 01/14/17 07:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534 |
This is a close to the top class gun, very elegant. I think that 1883 makes sense. For once, Holland & Holland was called as such starting in 1876. N. Brown shows it as 1881, but a quick call to H&H will give you the answer. Best regards, WC-
Last edited by WildCattle; 01/15/17 12:17 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Greg, sorry, but I can't give you any definitive value; just not enough comparables. I can say H&H is Brand Value one (BV1). I'm inclined to call Current Condition level at three (CC3 = significant use). Original Quality grade I'd place at "Best Work" to "A". Later hammerguns tend to grade like boxlocks. But I think this gun falls outside the "tend".
BV1-OQ3-CC3 = $10,936 BV1-OQ4-CC3 = $8,323 BV1-OQ5-CC3 = $6,296
Somewhere within that range. Hope that helps a little. I'd love to see comparables with known sale prices.
DDA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Can't tell for sure from the photos but I'd sure check out the firing pin holes for roundness and corrosion.
It is a nice tarted up hammer gun but unless the barrels and choking are something really special I don't see the gun being worth over 3 or 4 grande.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,530 Likes: 82
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,530 Likes: 82 |
As a patent lasts for 16 years then that suggests the gun as made between 1865 and 1881 although the action could have been made prior to that before it was finished .The 29229 would be the registered action built under or using the patent so that would IMHO make it at the end of the patent period and from the style of the action I would estimate around 1880 .
|
|
|
|
|