|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,484
Posts545,269
Members14,410
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
James M all that poll means is that 97% of those that both saw and responded to the poll think that there is a cover-up. It is not a valid poll.
But the FBI handed out immunity like Peanut M&Ms. One of the Fox talking heads said that all the administration figures refusing to answer a question by invoking their Fifth Amendment rights made it look like an investigation of a Cosa Nostra family.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
James M all that poll means is that 97% of those that both saw and responded to the poll think that there is a cover-up. It is not a valid poll.
But the FBI handed out immunity like Peanut M&Ms. One of the Fox talking heads said that all the administration figures refusing to answer a question by invoking their Fifth Amendment rights made it look like an investigation of a Cosa Nostra family. Mike: I thought that was clear in my citing the source of the poll. You can look elsewhere and still fine the most Americans believe this is true as well. Jim http://nypost.com/2016/09/28/the-fbis-hillary-email-probe-is-looking-even-more-like-a-coverup/
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394 |
James, you qualified your generalization by saying "almost" all the media isn't what you say it is. There are polling companies respected for integrity. You discriminate, observe the difference. Discerning citizens do the same by taking their findings into account, knowing they're snapshots on a given day of what people say they're thinking on issues. King, research polling companies. The respected ones. The industry in in crisis because they are having difficulty accessing the broad cross section of people to answer their questions. New communication technology has striated their access. When they contact people now, it's not random....too much self selection.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
But the FBI handed out immunity like Peanut M&Ms. I thought immunity was to force testimony by clearing the self incrimination dodge...Geo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
But the FBI handed out immunity like Peanut M&Ms. I thought immunity was to force testimony by clearing the self incrimination dodge...Geo I thought immunity is offered to one party or another. How does it work out when both sides have immunity? Why not just decline to prosecute?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
James understands discrimination clearly in distinguishing respected polling organizations from suspect ones. Although we're often conservative and liberal in our political opinions, convoluted inferences aren't needed to get our points across, as with most members here. Any "feeling" is to engage and respect other opinions. Trump is even more respectful and discriminating: he said after the debate he held back because he “didn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
Oh. I get it. Immunity went way past the wiping the server and extended to perjury as well. That way they just lie about who (nobody apparently) told them to do it and no one can do anything about it. Nah, the FBI chief is not in the tank...Geo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
The real sick joke here is Cheryl Mills was needlessly given immunity. As an attorney working for Clinton all she had to do was claim attorney-client privilege and that would have been the end of it.
My understanding is that the FBI director is stating that they will NOT re-open the investigation even with the new facts that have come to light. Up until recently I have for the most part refused to believe that crookedness was spread this far and deep into the Obama administration. Initially O'Reilly exonerated the FBI Director stating "he is a good honest man". O'Reilly retracted that statement last night on his program. based upon the most recent developments. I'm still expecting even more damaging information from Wikileaks over the up coming weeks.
My opinion of our Federal government has reached a nadir and I doubt if I'm alone with this opinion.
Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
....Nah, the FBI chief is not in the tank...Geo Nah, can't be. It's probably just coincidence that the IT fellow got the free immunity pass for 'wiping' away a bunch-o-stuff after he got the congressional order to preserve the records. King, I was just kidding about that discrimination stuff. There's no way the rhetoric would resonate with those college think tank genius' whining about being entitled to a free vacation in 'higher' education. Ain't that the way to show the value of a college degree.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
Don't know nothin' about college degrees. Haven't got one.
|
|
|
|
|
