|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,523
Posts545,796
Members14,420
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Judicious use of the moderator's power to ban trolls, trolling, and baiting would also make this a better place. And you'd be the first brain dead mO'f'r troller to go...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
Ted, in the AA Brown thread you referenced and linked, jOe insulted those who disagreed with him. Why? They hadn't insulted him. They even went out of their way to step over his insults. And he was wrOng, and wrOng again, and wrOng again, and the whole time he was insulting them for daring to disagree with the omniscient HomelessjOe. How could anybody so ignOrant be so arrOgant?
He must have been cOmpensating because he knew he really was a stUpid, ignOrant, meAn-spirited, ill-mAnnered dOg. And, of course, hE still is.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Mike....let me out of your head.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
Ted, in the AA Brown thread you referenced and linked, jOe insulted those who disagreed with him. Why? They hadn't insulted him. They even went out of their way to step over his insults. And he was wrOng, and wrOng again, and wrOng again, and the whole time he was insulting them for daring to disagree with the omniscient HomelessjOe. How could anybody so ignOrant be so arrOgant? He must have been cOmpensating because he knew he really was a stUpid, ignOrant, meAn-spirited, ill-mAnnered dOg. And, of course, hE still is.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,983 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,983 Likes: 106 |
Judicious use of the moderator's power to ban trolls, trolling, and baiting would also make this a better place. And you'd be the first brain dead mO'f'r troller to go... I'm guilty......Ted chastised me for not admitting to anything so I'm admitting I baited him earlier in this thread. He totally pissed me off in the Browning BSS sidelock thread, really throwing mud in the new owner of the Grade II's face, but really it was all in an effort to give the statements I made in the thread less credence. Statements such as 'downright ridiculous' were made by none other than Ted after I said, well if a Browning BSS sidelock isn't svelte then a Holland Royal isnt svelte either'. Ted likes to be argumentative for the sake of being argumentative, so in my opinion my baiting of him got him what he deserved. I don't regret it. Not for a second.
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757 |
Total and complete bullshit again, Buzz. The only even slightly negative comment leveled specifically at the BSS sidelock in the entire thread was that they weren't a collectable yet. I didn't say it.
You did.
No one threw mud, in any way, shape or form at the new owner, or his gun. A few folks had mentioned they had owned them and sent them down the road looking for lighter guns. I pointed out that it was quite likely the guns didn't fit them. A gun that doesn't fit someone has nothing per say wrong or inferior about it, it simply doesn't fit that particular human.
If pointing that out is slinging mud, God help us.
Best,
Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Ted do those chit stained cleaning patches (made from your old pAnties) really put a shine on the MOss'turd barrel ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757 |
Ted do those chit stained cleaning patches (made from your old pAnties) really put a shine on the MOss'turd barrel ? If you ever looked at anyone else's undies, I'm sure the complete lack of any stains would be a wonderous surprise to a rube like you. Soap and laundry equipment miss your little corner of the world, jOe? Sure sounds like it. Stain free, up here. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
The English always had or have trouble building stout guns for waterfowl hunting and handling those stout waterfowl loads, everyone knows that.
Of course, for the last few centuries or so they built guns that can handle loads that can take down an eight ton elephant, a five ton rhino, a four ton hippo and a few two ton cape buffaloe, but those stout waterfowl guns to bring down those 4 pound pit bull like Canadian geese, yep, that's beyond them.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
The English always had or have trouble building stout guns for waterfowl hunting and handling those stout waterfowl loads, everyone knows that.
Of course, for the last few centuries or so they built guns that can handle loads that can take down an eight ton elephant, a five ton rhino, a four ton hippo and a few two ton cape buffaloe, but those stout waterfowl guns to bring down those 4 pound pit bull like Canadian geese, yep, that's beyond them. Good point Treb! Of course, wrOng-agAin-jOe just wants to change the conversation to the strength of English wildfowl guns and from the fact that hE got the maker, the action, the lockup, and the hinge pin all wrOng on the Gallyon in this thread: See wrOng-agAin-jOe argue about English made action with actual English gunmakers How could anyOne so ignOrant be so arrOgant?
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
