doublegunshop.com - home Forums Online Defamation

I miss LD's fishing adventures when it's dead cold up here!

I miss LD around these parts too. It was probably a bunch of things, but he had an odd little meltdown about comments to a picture of a whale off the back of his boat.

It didn't seem to be about political purity, just feelings got the upper hand in a decision that I'd figure was right for him.

You did read what King just wrote didn't you? Someone may try civil discussion about political purity, and not even realize that they're being 'played' as a fool. Weird, eh?

I enjoyed Last Dollar's posts. Greg Taggart as well. Greg's problem he is a liberal educator. He hasn't posted on Doublegun since 2010. If you miss him, he's posting over on Shootin' Spotesm'n now. I don't know why he doesn't come back here, the wingnuts there give him hell. Who knows, maybe the same guys...Geo

The Freak Show continues with King, Ed Good, and SKB considering it mean spirited to repeat and reproduce King's own anti-2nd Amendment words. You'd think he'd be proud of them but he wishes to dance away from them and pretend that he is pro-Gun. It's much the same with our self-described "Independent Moderate" Caitlyn SKB who is very moderate when it comes to defending anti-gun Liberal Democrats, but demonizing and insulting when it comes to Conservative Republicans. His description of Last Dollar as a Conservative is as dishonest as anything I have ever read here. All of the so-called "Independent Moderates" have short memories when it comes to recalling Last Dollar lambasting and insulting the Conservatives here. I don't even recall Greg Taggart and do not believe I ever had any discussion, civil or otherwise, with him. I'm still waiting for Geo to tell me who the poor sensitive "good guys" are who were driven off by mean Conservatives. You'd think there was no similar attempt to drive off Conservatives via trolling, insults, and implied threats of legal action. Take a look at virtually all of Replacement's recent posts and try to tell me that it is only rightwingnuts engaging in nastiness. I'm sure that noticing the hypocrisy will once again make me a villain.

Here's King's own words again. Read 'em and weep King.



First off, I'm not smiting (or smiteing) all of the anti's, but I am illuminating King Brown's and Ed Good's anti-gun rhetoric by reproducing their own words and saving them in one convenient thread where no sane person could deny them. I said, no SANE person could deny them.

They are no narcissistic monument to myself King, but they are your legacy. I'm pretty sure no-one even thinks of me when they read your words denigrating the strategies of the NRA or suggesting that we concede ground to the anti-gunners. If you are not happy with what you said, then why did you say those things?





How about this King... do you remember saying this from your post # 308159 on 1/8/13?

"Your messages appear as from one who hasn't been involved directly in action of what it takes to beat back grabbers other than a NRA membership. (And that antagonizing NRA comment while the nation mourning was no service to our cause, as I said here at the time. Better that the NRA would consider what Obama proposing and it would respond in good time in the country's best interests etc.)"

It is not in any way, shape, or form Pro-Gun or Pro-NRA or Pro-2nd Amendment to suggest that "Americans accept mass murder to defend an individual right to bear arms in the name of personal freedom." But you didn't simply suggest it King. You came right out and said it.



You're right King... this is a freak show. Look at all the freaks in denial of their own words. You are like an abortion doctor claiming to be pro-life. And now you are imagining me trumpeting that 80,000 have viewed your thread. Do you check the tally every day? Don't blame me for how many people viewed your anti-gun rhetoric. You and Ed said those things, not me. I merely voiced my opinion that you are here to support and defend anti-gun politicians, and to LULL and undermine us, and to criticize our Right to Keep and Bear Arms based upon the evidence you provided. If you wish to shoot the messenger, that is fine by me. But you'll have to shoot yourself.

keet: if you were sincere here, one would hope to see you engage in civil discourse...however, what we see instead is a constant flow of redundant rudeness...

and because of your long history of jumping to wrong conclusions and making false statements here, few take you seriously...certainly, not i.

and keet, as for our right to keep and bear arms, there is no federal guarantee of that right. the federal government was never granted the authority to guarantee anyone the right to keep and bear arms. all the second amendment does is to limit the federal government from infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms, in the context of a well regulated militia...

and therefore, in my opinion, all federal laws, rulings and policies regarding arms are unconstitutional...and, as per the tenth amendment, regulation of arms and other powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the constitution and its amendments, are left to the states or to the people...

if you wish to advocate for a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a national right of people to keep and bear firearms, then do so...but, please...cease your nonsense here.

"I'm still waiting for Geo to tell me who the poor sensitive "good guys" are who were driven off by mean Conservatives."

keith, was that a request for a list? How about a list of those conservtives run off by the liberals...Geo

'We' ran the old King off, got him to vote liberal for the first time ever! Where do you find them smilie things that look like the eyes are bugging out?

Nice buck this AM.

Thanks Craig. I taught those boys everything they know about huntin', but I didn't teach'em everything I know!...Geo

Yes Geo, that was a request for a list. Even a decent representative partial list would be nice.

Then we can try to play fair and balanced for a change and tackle the question of Conservatives who were run off by Liberals... Or more accurately, Conservatives who got sick and tired of trying to debate people who lied and presented false data and then got all huffy and butt-hurt when they were called out on it.

That pretty much sums up why Jim departed, but King Brown dishonestly attempts to paint a different scenario. But of course, I am mean-spirited and wrong for pointing that out.