S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,138
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,469
Posts545,142
Members14,409
|
Most Online1,299 Apr 26th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890 |
For the noted liberal mouthpieces that frequent Misfires....
If a muslim barber refuses to cut the hair of a gay person due to the muslim's religious convictions, whose side does the liberal take?
Let the liberal heads start spinning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850 |
GaryW, you may drive our resident libtards nuts with that one. Kind of like putting them in a round room and tell them to piss in a corner.
Practice safe eating. Always use a condiment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
Maybe a round room is a source of comfort. They start walking along a wall so they feel like they're keeping busy, and convince themselves that there's no time to waste on this one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931 |
If you wanna create a real hard paradox, you've gotta try a bit harder. This one has at least three easy and logical solutions.
UPD: as I'm not sure when I'm gonna visit this site again, I'll give the answers right away:
1) side with neither, because, in a perfect society, the situation would not be a problem any more than a buddhist's refusal to taste a meat course is. The muslim has the right to a faith, and the gay is free to take his business elsewhere;
2) in an IMperfect society, if one of the groups is priviledged and the other is oppressed, side with the oppressed, no matter which it is;
3) if you HAVE to pick one, and all other things are equal, think about this: a creed is a matter of choice, homosexuality is an physiological condition over which the individual has no control. You can stop being a muslim (christian, buddhist, atheist, etc.), but you can't stop being gay. That makes these groups pretty much not the same.
Last edited by Humpty Dumpty; 07/15/15 01:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
In USA it is give a haircut or pay a big fine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
In all probability, the Muslim Barber would use his straight razor to behead the gay customer, and the Liberals would increase taxes to erect a memorial while they completely ignored the crime committed by the Muslim. The death would be written off as workplace violence, and be blamed on white privilege. All white Barbers would be required to attend sensitivity training classes which would of course require a dramatic increase in the cost of licensing the Barber.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
Truer words never said, Humpty Dumpty. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
For the noted liberal mouthpieces that frequent Misfires....
If a muslim barber refuses to cut the hair of a gay person due to the muslim's religious convictions, whose side does the liberal take?
Let the liberal heads start spinning. You are one of the noted Libtard mouthpieces that frequent Misfires King. Why don't you take a stab at the question? Or is your head spinning too fast?
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
....This one has at least three easy and logical solutions....
....if you HAVE to pick one, and all other things are equal....homosexuality is an physiological condition over which the individual has no control....but you can't stop being gay. That makes these groups pretty much not the same. A case could be made that these words are true, but the truth is, logic doesn't matter HD. All the facts and reasoning in the world won't change the feelings of some. Take your homosexuality 'logical' solution for example. If there is an inability to stop being gay and no physiological control over it, then, the exact same is concluded about heterosexualuality. Opinion polls, planned parenthood's business model and the scientific community are all in agreement of where babies come from. You claim there is 'choice' for some. Where in all of recorded history has radical islam 'chose' to reach across any aisle. The only thing that has ever slowed or stopped ideological islam is the confrontation by a superior force. In all of history, anywhere that extremist islam wants to be or do, it does if there is weakness. Please explain where it has 'chose' otherwise, not theories.
|
|
|
|
|