doublegunshop.com - home Forums Now Here's a Couple of True Racists

The socialist turd polisher has proven he/she has no opinion of his own....

jOe please stop helping me.

Mike,
I did call out Jim for being a racist on the offending thread.

So is planned parenthood rounding up pregnant black woman who want to become mothers and forcing them to abort? If so, I had not heard of that. I was under the impression that most who seek abortion are not ready to raise a child. I think young black women make poor choices regarding sexual and reproductive health and at a much higher rate than the non-Latino white population.

Can you you show me where you have seen a real link between illegal Latino immigrants negatively impact poor blacks? Are poor blacks lining up to work in agriculture fields to pick the crops and being denied jobs? I think the high unemployment in black communities has little to do with illegal Latino immigration. I could be wrong. If so, point me to something to read on the matter.

What I find ironic is that Republicans continue to shun the fastest growing segment of the population. That the Democrats would try to lure the Hispanic vote in through amnesty and loosening immigration restrictions does not shock me in the least. Does it you? At some point as matter of practicality I feel the Republicans must embrace immigration reform. The system is broke, something needs to change. Do you really think we can round up tens of millions of people and ship them home? I don't see it happening under any administration.

Two interesting and complex issues Mike but in my mind hardly racism.

Steve, if this morning you thought you needed to call Jim out for being a racist why didn't you do it on the offending thread? By calling him out on this thread it made it look like you couldn't dispute his arguments or his facts so you disputed his character.

Paraphrasing my liberal friend King's comments, "You aren't nearly as racist this morning as you usually are. Good job Jim!" But his response also makes it look like he had no good arguments against Jim's first post so he decided to do a little ad hominem himself.

I have been a contractor since 1981. Let's say that Obama gets his backdoor amnesty plan through the SCOTUS. So I have a choice. I can hire an eighteen year old life-long citizen of the United States or I can hire a thirty year old Mexican National. And the world being what it is, I have to pay them both or either $7.50 per hour.

Now the citizen will probably have to go through several jobs before he has learned to show up on time five days a week, week after week. That Mexican National has been working since he was eleven and has that skill. Then the Mexican National probably has tool skills that the eighteen year old doesn't have. The Mexican is probably willing to work on a roof in the sun in 105F where the citizen won't (for $7.50 an hour). If it is legal to hire the Mexican I know who I will hire. If it is illegal to hire the Mexican I know some of my competitors will anyway.

Suppose that the President enforces the law and deports most of the illegal immigrants, say 80%. Say the employers that hire illegal aliens are prosecuted. If I want to stay in business I am going to have to pay a lot more than $7.50 to get that kid up on on that roof in the middle of July. And I am going to put up with a lot more BS than I would if I knew I could hire that Mexican. From experience I know that many of those sorry eighteen year olds, after they have been fired enough times and rehired and worked with and lectured turn into good workers and decent human beings. But if I can hire that Mexican National why would I bother.

It is well documented that chicken factories are overrun with illegal aliens. Those jobs could go to citizens.

Young Black men have an unemployment rate of about 20%. Illegal aliens take the entry level jobs that our Black youths have historically used to enter the workforce. Blacks are impacted more than Whites because Whites are, on average, better educated and more intelligent. Jobs requiring above average intelligence and education are not available to non-English speaking illegal aliens, at least when the first get here. So the Blacks bare the great burden of the Democrats' cynical and amoral trade-off.

My "racist is as racist does" bit was a mockery of the Democrats' contention that anything that has a disparate impact on Blacks is racist. So if Blacks, on average, score lower than Whites then the test must be racist. Often, Blacks live in the urban center city with Whites in the suburbs. If you draw voting districts along the lines of the city and the suburbs you get a much higher percentage of Blacks in the urban city than in the suburb cities. So the Democrat candidate might win the urban city voting district with 80% of the vote. The Democrats say that the disparate impact of drawing the districts along city borders deprives them of Democratic representatives. They want to gerrymander the wasted black votes (anything over 51%) into the white suburbs so they can get more representatives elected. So if it has a disparate impact on Blacks, according to the Democrats, it is racist and wrong - except if it is amnesty for illegal aliens or a 700% higher abortion rate for Blacks than Whites. Those two cases of disparate impact represent the highest order of freedom, morality and fairness.

Another thing I don't get. Democrats say Republicans are racists. Democrats are for abortion. If Blacks get abortions at seven times the rate of non-Latino Whites why aren't the racist Republicans supporting abortion? Add to that the fact that Blacks vote about 80% for Democrats why aren't the cold blooded Republicans supportive of abortion? After all, eight out of ten aborted Black babies, had they lived, would likely become Democrats.

A side note. When the true unemployment rate gets down to five percent, I am all for bringing in immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America. The many poor Mexican National immigrants I have interacted with have all been fine people with good values and the best workers I ever saw.

Also, I would like to see a spirited defense of Planned Parenthood from some of my liberal friends here.

Quote from Mike:
"A side note. When the true unemployment rate gets down to five percent, I am all for bringing in immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America. The many poor Mexican National immigrants I have interacted with have all been fine people with good values and the best workers I ever saw."

Here's another "racist"** who agrees with this as well. My son-in-law is of Mexican decent and he and the rest of his family are fine law-abiding people who make good residents and Americans. There isn't a "THUG" among them.
Jim

**Racist: A term applied to individuals who quote facts that can't be refuted by socialist Libtards who then have to resort to trying to denigrate the quoter instead.

So, is Planned Parenthood lining up poor blacks and forcing them into abortions? No, of course not. Margaret Sanger and others intentionally set it up in a manner that would not be so obvious which is proven by her own words.

Lefty Stevie, aka SKB, is too dumb and too agenda driven to see that or admit to it. Same goes for King Brown and the other Libtards who conveniently ignore the very racist past of the Democrat Party and try to dishonestly hang that tag on Conservatives.

We don't see poor blacks lining up to work on farms because they are not poor. They have been handed enough Welfare benefits that they do not have the incentive to do farm work. AmarilloMike spoke of this in another thread about the massive minority unemployment in Baltimore, and the refusal of the unemployed to move to Texas or other places where the jobs are. So we see Liberal Democrats dishonestly courting two constituencies by bribing blacks with Welfare paid by the taxpayers, and Hispanics by illegally allowing them to break Immigration Law by turning a blind eye toward border security.

I'd imagine that SKB thinks Republicans would be wise to also pursue their votes by acting so dishonestly, but SKB would still be a Leftist Libtard who pretends to be Conservative because he doesn't have the courage to be honest about his convictions. I'll give that much to King Brown. He admits to being a Liberal idiot who supports anti-gun politicians. SKB supports anti-gun politicians, yet derives his income from working on firearms, so he has to hide the truth. He should really stop gun work and start making bongs.

SKB has me on ignore because he thinks not seeing me write the truth about his hypocrisy will make it invisible. I probably should give him a new nickname... Caitlyn SKB, because he has no balls.

Mike,
I called Jim out for being the offensive racist he is several times on the original thread. I guess you missed it. On the first page and then again right before he tells the heart wrenching story of the burden he had to endure of dating a Danish girl.

I will grant you that jobs in chicken factories could go to citizens. Are there any applying for the jobs and not being hired? I'm pretty sure in the cattle processing plants out in western Kansas the citizens do not want those jobs nor will they take them. I disagree with you that blacks are less intelligent than whites. Less educated certainly but not less intelligent. Did you see the kid admitted to every single ivory league school this past year? It was not white kid from suburbia. I would never say Republicans are racists. I know entirely too many who are not and judge people as individuals. Several on this board come to mind such as yourself and Ken.
Steve

Well, it looks like Caitlyn SKB thinks that if he keeps repeating the lie that Jim is a racist, it will eventually stick. He hasn't produced any evidence except his own biased opinion. Of course, we've all seen King Brown and other Libtards employ the same method for years. But they all dishonestly pretend to ignore the racism of many leading Democrats even when they have it shoved right under their noses. SKB will be tarring Jim with this lie for years, but you can bet your ass he will be voting for for the anti-gun Democrat Hillary despite her admiration for Margaret Sanger.

This is what I find so loathsome about most Liberal Leftists. You cannot really debate them and you will never change their minds with the truth. All you can and should do is point out their many lies. You also cannot let them dance away from it, as King Brown developed into an art form over the years. Anything else is a waste of time.

You've explained in the past that you're no obligation to reply to anything you don't want to. I couldn't agree more.

Back up to the original thread, there's a screen person that started it and a topic. Then the choice comes up to attack the person, and seemingly give tacit approval to the presidential front runner individual.

I notice on the main forum. We have 'friends' that refer to hunting as a 'slaughter and bloodlust', and 'experts' who would demonize a group of classic gun shooters in a personal injury court case. I wonder why pc says the the young black poor single mom has to quietly eat the sanger philosophy.