doublegunshop.com - home Forums So What Exactly IS the Difference?

This may explain amount of frustration Jimbo carries.....

I don't see any 4th of July parade attendees in this photo either Ken!
Jim

I don't see a comparison to a picture of a Tribe of Baboons either.

I think you need to get your glasses fixed! The Thugs are jumping all over a car with the intent of destroying it. The Tribe of Babboons is jumping all over a car to try and find food. Whatever damage they do is of no concern to them since they are animals. The end result with no responsible intervention is probably the same.
Ken I'm going to tell you one more thing then I'm going to drop it:
I managed Section 8 property on the South Side of Chicago for a couple of years. Thugs like the ones I pictured above are the norm in a Ghetto and I dealt with them on a daily basis. If you think for one minute they have any sense of responsibility or morals you can start thinking again.
This should give you some insight into the bizare "thinking" of Ghetto residents!

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/05/04/c...e-steals-201389

I'm not denying that these criminals are members of a sociopathic, criminal subculture. It is a subculture intentionally created by the Democrat Party.

What offends me is equating any people, in this case Blacks, to any species of Apes. As I mentioned before, it is dehumanizing, and in a back door sense also means less is expected of them. It is also, as I mentioned before, the mythological basis for the concept of "Race". Race, as far as Blacks, was initially used to advance the concept of "Parallel Evolution". It was asserted that Africans were descended from a different genetic line and species than White people. "[censored] Erectus" was usually used, but at different times "Neanderthal", or one of the other Archaic early human species was used as well.

It's really no different than the Nazis classifying Jews as "Rattenvolk".

You're missing my point by applying a collective standard to demonize whole groups of people, a tactic constantly used by the Democrats.

The real problem here Ken is that responsible Blacks need to stand up and say this is NOT acceptable behavior instead of making excuses for them and blaming groups like the police.
I'll give you an analogy:
Part of my ethnic background is Italian. What responsible blacks do by not speaking out would be the same as me making excuses for Italian criminals and Mafia members. Responsible Blacks need to disassociate themselves from these Ghetto Thugs in the same way responsible Americans of Italian decent disassociated themselves from Italian criminals. Instead they refer to them as their "brothers"!
If these problems can be fixed pouring more money into this cesspool is not going to do it.

So, you're saying that Italian criminals and the ones who wouldn't speak up about them were the same as Baboons? See my point?

Thugs are Thugs, regardless of ethnic background.

It really looks and quacks like 'collectively', less is expected of them. Offensive certainly is subjective, but the rational doesn't seem to support any 'back door' need for the pc of selective criminality.

Many of my fellow Army Officers and Enlisted Men were Black. They were like any other people, some good, some less so. The same as any others.

The "Back Door" is the rationalization of dependency, as well as not expecting the same degree of Personal Responsibility expected of Whites. The best example being Black Men taking responsibility for their children. Fortunately, the criminal justice system yet has to go wholesale to a double-standard, although there are constant attempts to do so.

My taking offense is solely of a personal nature, as I adopted my two sons in Africa. I can assure you that they find what happened in Baltimore to be as repugnant as I do. It is the application of a collective standard to them that causes me to be offended.