doublegunshop.com - home Forums The Face of True Evil

When Canada went to war, most thought it the best thing going to get away from lingering grey Depression, unemployment, and many British immigrants to fight for their former home country. To a man it was the greatest experience of their lives. Sure, they'd do it again, it was worth doing, but it wasn't all chivalric magnanimity; their regrets were the waste, the waste.

That's funny shit craigd, and I'm sure everyone has noticed how the good little Libtard soldier King Brown follows the DNC playbook to the letter.

"The waste, the waste"... blah, blah, blah, blather blather, so on and so forth, ad nauseum... give us a f-ing break already. It's like one of those old sleep learning tapes that endlessly repeat the same crap. I wonder how his wife puts up with him. She's gotta be a saint.

That's better you old Atheist... using the lower case g to spell God instead of your disingenuous "praying for Jim" crap.

I think Jim was making the point that it was extreme Left wingers, and Soros... to the tune of at least $33 million of his own money, who were the driving forces behind turning Constitutionally protected protest... no matter how wrong or misguided... into rioting, looting, and burning. From day one, it appeared that it was the outsiders that were bussed in by Liberal Leftist groups hell bent on fomenting tensions that caused 98% of the problems, along with race hustlers like Al Sharpton.

There are laws in this country against inciting riots, and the actions of Soros and others can be readily linked to untold millions of $ in damage, renewed racial tensions, massive costs to taxpayers for Police and National Guard protection, and the deaths of two NYC Police Officers. And all you can worry about is someone's wish or belief that a Nazi sympathizer/traitor to his own people scumbag like Soros should be shot??? We don't have the Thought Police you'd like to see here yet King, and Jim still has the right to his opinions... with which many of us agree. Jim threatened no one, but you wish to make a big deal out of nothing while ignoring the egregious legal and human rights violations done by Obama and other Liberals.

What motivates you to be such a dishonest and hypocritical piece of "the waste, the waste"?

"Of those hundreds, how many say, no way, I'd never do it again. Unless you seek out whiners and malingerers, I'll bet every one to a man says, however distasteful, I'd do it again for my country and my brothers."

WWII, sure you will get those kind of answers. Iraq? Much less likely. It is pretty hard to see how Iraq was a real threat to us here in the U.S.A. and it is also quite obvious that the Iraq war was a mistake and a total waste of resources and lives.You can try to re-frame it anyway you like but it always comes out the same.....We should never went in to Iraq and it will forever be a stain on the Bush(shrub that it) administration's legacy.

The Bottom Line:

Iranian born Valerie Jarrett is more of a President than Obama is and she is an enemy within through and through. Digging all the way down to who is behind the Fergusion riots, you find a cadre of communists, radicals, Islamists, Progressives and in the end, the face behind the chaos is the Muslim Brotherhood-connected visage of the President�s consigliere � the voice of Iran and a devout Marxist, Valerie Jarrett.

He would get my vote. It's too bad he isn't going to the Republican nomination.

Well, here's Stevie again, still fighting the Iraq war and those who took us there. Does Stevie understand that the greatest "...waste, the waste" is the total waste of lives and resources that resulted when we pulled out prematurely and simply allowed everything we fought for to fall back into the hands of Islamic Extremists under the control of Iran?

Does anyone think that Stevie will hold the same kind of grudge against Hillary Clinton in 2016 that he has for the "Shrub"? Because as you can see here, Hillary, John Kerry, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, and a slew of other Dumbocrat Senators voted Yes on the Resolution to authorize Bush to invade Iraq.

Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush's Iraq resolution. A "yes" vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A "no" vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting "yes" were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting "no" were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/transcripts/senaterollcall_iraq101002.htm

I'll bet Stevie will hold his nose and vote for the anti-2nd Amendment Lady Hillary Clinton, because that's what Libtard gun owners who can't think for themselves do.

Geography is considered outcast subject and very challenging to grasp even for well educated Americans. Gee, perhaps some of those voting thought Iraq was Iran. The country name differs by just ONE letter.

Well Jagermeister, I'm pretty sure you are also the kind of Libtard who would vote for the anti-gun Democrat every time... even if they were so stupid as to not know the difference between Iraq and Iran.

I have not yet met even one Dumbocrat who can tell me anything of what was in the Resolution to invade Iraq the second time. Most still think we were retaliating for the attack on 9-11. Most also seem to think that Bush unilaterally went to war without the approval of a majority of the Democrats in the Senate. That's because most are a bunch of brainless DNC Sheeple who let their Union leaders do their thinking for them.

Well, well, wouldn't you know: an American woman in the White House was behind the Ferguson riots. A Muslim Brotherhood acolyte to boot!

It's obvious who the radicals are here.