It's your thread, Dave. You say "NY Times admits Iraq had WMDs" when it did not. You can't show where it did. No one---not the US, UN, EU, UK, NATO or anyone---has attached the term WMD to what was found except you and Jim.
Well, I've read this entire thread over a couple times and cannot find anywhere Jim said that the NYT article ever used the term WMD. Jim called him on it several times but our resident liar cannot admit that he was wrong or apologize for his misstatement of fact.
Even more to the point is the insane level of denial and dishonesty that King exhibits when he is so adamant that Sarin, Mustard Gas, etc., are not WMD, simply because the NYT article does not refer to them as such. Isn't that about as dishonest as attempting to say that a "revolver" is not a "gun"??? Just what the hell are they? Why does he find it so important to discredit Dave K's veracity on the smallest technicality?
Of course, I have referred to WMD found in Iraq numerous times myself. I provided links to articles that told of the Polish Army contingent of the international coalition finding artillery shells loaded with cyclosarin, a more potent form of sarin. King always ignored them and dishonestly went on claiming there were no WMD in Iraq and dishonestly claiming we mistakenly and foolishly went to war there because of the 9-11 attacks. Former Senator Rick Santorum R-PA went public in 2006 with stories of WMD found in Iraq, against the wishes of Karl Rove who felt the Republicans had been(dishonestly)beaten on that issue and it was best not to pursue the matter further. Dave K makes the point that George Bush did not refer to an "active" WMD program when he made the case to take out Saddam. Yet King still clings to his deceptive claims because he is all about protecting the lies of Liberal Democrats who, not incidentally, would love to restrict and/or eliminate our Second Amendment Rights.
I do wish Jim had taken a few minutes to reproduce one of King's many lies. I fully understand that Jim might see it as a complete waste of time because King is a compulsive liar who mentally cannot and will not ever admit to his dishonesty. I've proved it numerous times, often using his exact words, yet he maintains that he has never told a lie, "something he knows not to be true" here ever. I just gave but one example above when he ignored written proof of the cyclosarin shells found in Iraq. Here's a big fat Whopper right within this thread. You don't have to search very long or hard to find King saying something he "knows not to be true".
Good move, Jim: Letting go if you can't find a source to support your claim "the New York Times admitted Iraq had WMDs after all."
Here's another recent Whopper from the Burger King:
It's what you get with a committee-like "checks and balances" governance where neither option is effective and you wind up with the deep blue sea. You chose middlemen when wholesale was available. Most developed countries went the other way.
This was King Brown's answer to criticism of ObamaCare in the recent "ObamaCare Effects on Pawn Stars Business" thread. King, who has been in total denial about ObamaCares effects on Health Care costs in the U.S., apparently is attempting to portray that law as "checks and balances" governance when he knows there was zero Republican input accepted and zero Republican support for it. Again, something he "knows not to be true", but he says it anyway.
Or how about his frequent dishonest references to Mitt Romney and Republicans as misogynist while he is able to ignore far more egregious behaviors in his good Kennedy buddies, or those of Bill Clinton who sexually assaulted a young female intern with a cigar and had her perform fellatio on him in the Oval Office. Again, this is something he "knows not to be true" but it's DNC propaganda and lies he will parrot in order to support and give cover to sleazy Liberal Democrat Anti-Gunners.
My favorites though are those when King denies being an anti-gun, anti Second Amendment LULLER. Here's his words, verbatim, from his post # 308159 on 1/8/13 in the "Obama Pushing For Massive Gun Control" thread:
"Your messages appear as from one who hasn't been involved directly in action of what it takes to beat back grabbers other than a NRA membership. (And that antagonizing NRA comment while the nation mourning was no service to our cause, as I said here at the time. Better that the NRA would consider what Obama proposing and it would respond in good time in the country's best interests etc.) Unwarranted inflaming of public opinion is a mistake, and in confrontations of this kind, it's the faux pas that can kill you. Some November dandies come to mind."Hopefully, this November will be a dandy, and we can at least slow down or stop some of the idiotic nonsense that King is here to promote no matter what lies, dishonesty, or half-truths he has to use. Remember to urge all of your shooting friends to get out and register and vote. A little donation to NRA Political Victory Fund wouldn't hurt either right now.
