|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,565
Posts546,387
Members14,423
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
If Obama had a son....he probibly would have robbed those people.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
If Obama had a son....he probibly would have robbed those people. That is incorrect. Most blacks are not robbers. Most sons of presidents are not robbers. So the probability is that he would not have robbed those people.
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 07/22/13 03:17 PM.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
If Obama had a son....he probibly would have robbed those people. That is incorrect. Most blacks are not robbers. Most sons of presidents are not robbers. So the probability is that he would not have robbed those people. Black 17 year old in that town in FL....most likely a criminal. Or a totally terrorised victim of them. Like most places NOT along the mexican border...most of the crime isn't Innuit immigrants.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
Black 17 year old in that town in FL....most likely a criminal.
Please give some source, study, or survey as proof a black seventeen year old in that town would have a better than even chance ("most likely") of being a criminal. I would assume that if President Obama had a son that son would not be from that town but from Chicago.
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 07/22/13 03:30 PM.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
Someone had a previos quote where blacks are like 5.3 times more likely to commit a crime.......if Blacks are even only 20 of the population....that totals to over 100%. And I'm willing to bet blacks are way more than 20% in Safford FL if they have projects. Safford Florida has TWICE the crime rate as is average for the entire USA. http://www.usa.com/sanford-fl-crime-and-crime-rate.htmSafford is 40% black who are over 5 times more likely to commit crimes than white people....simple do the math to see odds are if there is a crime...its a black person committing it there. http://www.movoto.com/neighborhood/fl/sanford/32771.htm
Last edited by boneheaddoctor; 07/22/13 03:41 PM.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
That is not correct.
If blacks were five times more likely to commit robbery than whites and 1 in 1000 whites were robbers then five in 1000 blacks would be robbers.
The number would have to be 501 blacks in 1000 for the theoretical son to be "most likely" to be a robber. That would mean that 100 out of 1000 whites would need to be robbers. Neither ratio is anywhere near those numbers.
Most whites aren't robbers. Most blacks aren't robbers. A black is much more likely to be a robber than a white but a black is likely not a robber.
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 07/22/13 03:44 PM.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
Safford is 40% black who are over 5 times more likely to commit crimes than white people....simple do the math to see odds are if there is a crime...its a black person committing it there.
We are discussing the odds that a theoretical black son of Obama would be a robber. Not what the odds are that a crime committed in Safford was committed by a black. So when one sees a 17 year old black walking out of WalMart or McDonalds or the park the odds are that he is not a robber. Most blacks are not robbers. Most blacks are not criminals. Blacks commit crimes at a higher rate than whites but that does not mean that most are criminals.
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 07/22/13 03:48 PM.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
That is not correct.
If blacks were five times more likely to commit robbery than whites and 1 in 1000 whites were robbers then five in 1000 blacks would be robbers.
The number would have to be 501 blacks in 1000 for the theoretical son to be "most likely" to be a robber. That would mean that 100 out of 1000 whites would need to be robbers. Neither ratio is anywhere near those numbers.
Most whites aren't robbers. Most blacks aren't robbers. A black is much more likely to be a robber than a white but a black is likely not a robber. I don't think you've spent much time in areas that the populations are overrepresetned by blacks. Because the crime rates are always higher there than neighboring areas that aren't. Sometimes significantly higher.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
That is not correct.
If blacks were five times more likely to commit robbery than whites and 1 in 1000 whites were robbers then five in 1000 blacks would be robbers.
The number would have to be 501 blacks in 1000 for the theoretical son to be "most likely" to be a robber. That would mean that 100 out of 1000 whites would need to be robbers. Neither ratio is anywhere near those numbers.
Most whites aren't robbers. Most blacks aren't robbers. A black is much more likely to be a robber than a white but a black is likely not a robber. I don't think you've spent much time in areas that the populations are overrepresetned by blacks. Because the crime rates are always higher there than neighboring areas that aren't. Sometimes significantly higher. The higher the ratio of blacks to whites in a neighborhood the higher the crime rate. That is because blacks are more likely to be criminals than whites. If the percentage of blacks was 25% in one neighborho0d and 75% in another then it is likely the black majority neighborhood would have about three times the crime rate of the black minority neighborhood. But a black in either neighborhood is most likely not a criminal.
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 07/22/13 03:59 PM.
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
That is not correct.
If blacks were five times more likely to commit robbery than whites and 1 in 1000 whites were robbers then five in 1000 blacks would be robbers.
The number would have to be 501 blacks in 1000 for the theoretical son to be "most likely" to be a robber. That would mean that 100 out of 1000 whites would need to be robbers. Neither ratio is anywhere near those numbers.
Most whites aren't robbers. Most blacks aren't robbers. A black is much more likely to be a robber than a white but a black is likely not a robber. I don't think you've spent much time in areas that the populations are overrepresetned by blacks. Because the crime rates are always higher there than neighboring areas that aren't. Sometimes significantly higher. The higher the ratio of blacks to whites in a neighborhood the higher the crime rate. That is because blacks are more likely to be criminals than whites. If the percentage of blacks was 25% in one neighborho0d and 75% in another then it is likely the black majority neighborhood would have about three times the crime rate as the black minority neighborhood. But a black in either neighborhood is most likely not a criminal. THat isn't true around here.....just because they haven't been caught yet and convicted doesn't mean they aren't running around committing crimes.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
