S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,498
Posts545,433
Members14,414
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13 |
Is it feasible to chamber sleeve a 12 ga barrel set to restore one that was proofed as 2 1/2" chambers but opened to 3"? Just the facts, please. No need to get into discussion about why it was done (I have no idea) nor the fact that it will still be out of proof (everybody knows that). Thanks.
[IMG]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839 |
Yes. Depending... Merrington does it. But you may need a background check...
Last edited by Bilious Bob; 04/10/13 10:53 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,020 Likes: 50
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,020 Likes: 50 |
Get it evaluated by a good smith like Merrington or Kearcher to determine if you need to actually do anything other than fire loads that do not exceed the pressures for 2.5 inch shells.
Depending on how much wall thickness remains you may not have an issue.
If it is determined there is not an issue then go ahead and ensure the case clearly note 2.5 inch low pressure and consider stamping it on the gun and go on and shoot low pressure 2.75 through it without much worry.
Then again if the evaluation comes back the walls are now dangerously then either of those two listed above could further drill it out and put the correct sleeve in.
Michael Dittamo Topeka, KS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
Yes, this should be do-able Gil.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105 |
Gil, are you trying to restore just the material that was removed when the chambers were punched from 2 1/2 to 3 inches? Usually, when I think of chamber sleeving, the goal is to reduce chamber size. For example, in order to shoot 12ga shells in a 10ga gun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 347 Likes: 5
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 347 Likes: 5 |
L. Brown, there was a nice article in Shooting Sportsman some time back about a gentleman who pioneered that type of sleeving getting it accepted by the British proofing system as I recall.
Sam Welch
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
In some of Dan Lefever's writings, one of his early catalogs as I recall, he mentioned that when he converted muzzle loaders to breech loaders he bored out the threads for the breech plugs & sleeved them for the new chamber, which according to him resulted in greater strength than cutting off the threaded portion as that would have left the chambers thinner. I don't know if he was the "Pioneer" of this "chamber sleeving" or not, but seriously doubt he had anything to do with the British Proof House accepting it.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 347 Likes: 5
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 347 Likes: 5 |
I thought I could easily find the article I remember but a scan of indexes didn't come up with anything that struck a cord. This was an article in the past few years. Maybe someday (as is usual) I will stumble into it again while looking for something else. Perhaps I should have used the term advocate rather than pioneer.
Last edited by SamW; 04/12/13 08:23 PM.
Sam Welch
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4 |
Gil,
I had a 10 ga 2 7/8 chamber sleeved to a 2 3/4 12 ga, and a 24 ga sleeved to 28 ga and they work great. If your gun was mine and the barrel thickness was ok ahead of the 2 3/4 area of the chamber, I would just shoot it and call it a long forcing cone.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13 |
Yes, Larry, my thought was just to restore it to its original dimensions. I have shot the gun many times, have not patterned it but I would just like to kind of put 'er back to the way she was. No, I don't have any interest in taking it from a 12 to a 16 or 20. I could do that with drop in tubes. thanks, Gil
[IMG]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,723 Likes: 480
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,723 Likes: 480 |
I had a 16 Sterlingworth with chambers ruined by two paper shells left in the chambers for several decades in a very wet climate. Having other 16's the only way to justify chamber sleeving was to go down to a 20. I could have found a set of donor barrels for less effort and money. But I wanted a long barrel 20 and went with a 20 ga. chamber sleeve to make a set of 20/16 over bored barrels. I figured that it would become long range death to all the doves. Funny they seem to fly around my patterns too often. Not the fault of the gun I am sure. I am sure you could have your gun sleeved if you want to keep it as a 12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 57
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 57 |
If you're sleeving damascus barrels, save the old barrels. There's an interesting story in the latest Shooting Sportsman about a guy who makes beautiful snap caps, oil bottles, and striker containers from cut off damascus barrels that would have been discarded. I don't like the idea of cutting off damascus barrels, but if it is done they could be used for secondary products. A section should also be saved for some kind of referance collection with full data on the type of gun it came from.Is there such a referance collection that anyone knows of? Maybe a project for one of the guncraft ass'n's?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,625 Likes: 13 |
Actually the barrels are very good. I just want to make them like they were.
[IMG]
|
|
|
|
|