April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 406 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,466
Posts545,088
Members14,409
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 11 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
JLN Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
Based on differing research I would bet that the chrome/nickel/vandium steels used in the early 1900's were still low carbon content steels. Typically less than .3% carbon which still allows for case hardening, but likely increases the strength of the internal soft metal due to added alloying elements.

It would have been better to have the frame annealed prior to engraving and then case hardened. That would have been my recommendation.

Annealing resets the grain structure across the entire part during the cool down process. You don't get that during the heating phase of case hardening. So case hardening a second time without annealing may have a higher tendency to fail.

Here is another link to some general information on Chromium steels (41xx class) noting that there is 4118, 4120 and 4130 which can be case hardened. See description at bottom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/41xx_steel

From one website noting chromium being added to low carbon steels:

The development of 9–12% chromium steels is reported to have originated in 1912 with the manufacture of a 12% Cr 2–5% Mo steel for steam turbine blades by Krupp and Mannesmann in Germany. However, in 1912–13 Brearley in the U.K., while attempting to develop high-temperature steels for gun barrels, accidentally discovered that martensitic steels containing 13% Cr and 0.2% C did not rust; the stainless characteristics of high-chromium steels were also recognized by Haynes in the USA and by Strauss and Maurer in Germany at about the same time.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
I have no doubt that the gun mfrs were playing with steel alloys in the first half of the century and earlier. I think they're still tinkering around with alloys.

As to whether or not "chromox" had carbon of sufficient quantity to harden, I suspect it did. I also suspect the "chromox" barrel steel wasn't used for frames. I welded LC Smith barrels from the 20's era and found that they hardened at the weld HAZ and weld bead from the 'self-quench' even though I used a mild steel rod.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Don,
Here's a link to a site that has some data on casehardened 8620. 8620 seems to have a big following for custom makers of singleshot rifles and possibly custom doubles that will get casehardened. Of particular interest to you may be the notation about the carburized casehardened thickness. They are quoting 1.9 mm.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
"I suppose heat treatment is generally thought of as hardening, but I guess steel might be treated with heat for results other than hardening.

craigd, heat can also be used to anneal (soften until re-heat treated) heat treated steel alloys.

"I'm still not sure though what process or goal of 'heat treating' the core of a low carbon steel receiver would be."

There would be no purpose of heating the core of a low carbon receiver. It is "along for the ride" when the receiver is being carburized and hardened.

Thanks, Chuck. I'll have a look at these. I agree with you that Chromox probably was a low carbon steel alloy. Thus, it would have worked fine for barrels which were heated sufficiently for tinning in the ribs and ?brazing? for joining and the lumps (I don't remember Fox barrels as being chopper lumps - could be wrong about that one). I also agree that it would have added some strength to the action, whether cased or not.

DDA

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292
Originally Posted By: Dick_dup1

Ned Schwing's book on the Model 21 and his discussion of the steel used in Model 21 frame manufacturing has nothing to do with Fox shotguns. The Chromox and Krupp steels referred to in Fox manufacturing were for the barrels and not the frame. Winchester specifciations for the Model 21 and Fox specifications have nothing to do with each other.
Fox recievers continued to be of mild steel and required case hardening while Winchster recievers were manufactured of high tensile steel requiring no surface (case) hardening which resulted in Winchester recievers being blued and Fox case hardened.
Dick


You are correct Dick.

Originally Posted By: Chuck H
I also suspect the "chromox" barrel steel wasn't used for frames.


You are also correct Chuck.


Dick lays it out quite matter-of-factly and is entirely correct.


ALL of the Fox frames were cyanide cased (after about 1910 or so) and were cased by Fred Heinzelman & Sons in Carlstadt, N.J. for as long as Fox was in business.......Heinzelman & Sons is still in business today and is still doing guns (110 years or so) and could probably answer all your Fox receiver frame alloy questions for the data compilers here who are interested.

Cheers,



Doug



Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Doug,
Although I think the chromox barrel steel wasn't used for frames, it is very possible that the differences that our members have seen in the frame characteristics was a result of other alloying agents being added or changed during production years. My guess is that nickel was probably added along the way and gave that yellowish shiney look that was mentioned.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292
Chuck, I would agree with that thinking, although the cyanide colors from Heinzelman stayed quite consistent over the years which would indicate the alloy mix stayed pretty much the same for a long time........if anyone here wants a complete analysis, they should forward a sample of their steel to Kachina Metal Testing Laboratories in Phoenix.

Kachina will conclusively analyze the steel for anyone that wants to know, in as much detail as you are willing to pay for......their primary business is aircraft steel and alloys. Kachina is an established metal laboratory with years of experience and all the latest equipment.

I have used them many times over the years and the results were outstanding.


Doug



Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
In one machine shop in which I put in betweeen 11 & 12 years 4130 & 4340 were our two main alloy steels. I would likely be utterly amazed if I had some way of knowing just how many pounds of each of these alloys I machined on & virtually all of it was subsequently heat treated. In all that time I never saw a part made of either case hardened. We normally did not case harden a part having a carbon content higher than 0.2%. 4130 we considered a water hardening steel & 4340 an oil hardening steel. Both of these alloys we heated in a neutral salt bath to hold down surface oxidation. Although we did not use near as much of it, we did occasionally use 4140 which due to the extra carbon over the 4130 was also oil quenched.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,879
Likes: 15
An interesting note on this website http://www.suppliersonline.com/propertypages/8620.asp
is that it indicates that 8620 will have a core strength of 135ksi after carburizing,quenching, and tempering at 250-300F. 135ksi core is pretty dang good for a casehardened part.

Page 7 of 11 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.082s Queries: 35 (0.061s) Memory: 0.8629 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-25 06:56:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS