S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 members (Der Ami, Marks_21, Ian Forrester, Karl Graebner, ClapperZapper, graybeardtmm3),
1,095
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,481
Posts545,238
Members14,410
|
Most Online1,335 Apr 27th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,737
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,737 |
Sorry to appear doubtful of your report, my intention is not to demean you in any way, it's just the nature of the email words, but.....are you positively sure that the shots did in fact cross? The hole on the left came from the right barrel and the hole on the right came from the left barrel?
I only ask because I'm incredulous that Armbrust loads made custom to that gun would behave in such a drastically awful way. I could accept that a wide spread resulted, even though that would be terrible in its own way.
Anyway, I would agree with sharps and try shooting them at longer ranges. I mean, what the hell, you've got the rounds, a few more shot through your barrels wouldn't require that much more cleaning.
Forgive what will definitely look like antagonistic words but, c'mon! I mean, passing immediate judgement after just 2 shots at 25 yards and then "putting the old gal away" seems downright insulting to that beautiful old gal.
Aren't you the least bit curious to know any further facts, even if they're not favorable? You're going to have to work up a regulated load for that wonderful gun sometime, or perhaps you can find someone who does such work for a fee if you're not set up to reload. But you've got to do the honorable thing and pursue regulating that Evans.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
I only ask because I'm incredulous that Armbrust loads made custom to that gun would behave in such a drastically awful way.
The Armbrust load is a duplicate of the Westley Richards Fauneta 20 bore loading and Huvius is aware of that. The load duplicates 1500fps and a 425gr bullet. There were however one or two lesser loadings used by Holland and Holland in the 20 bore Paradox. There may be perhaps other period loadings for the 20 bore ball and shot. Rifled choke guns are rare and extremely rare in the 20. Probably just a few hundred made by all makers. Downloading this cartridge shouldn't be a problem. The Armbrust load getting the velocity at the appropriate pressure was genius.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133 |
K.K., responses in blue. Sorry to appear doubtful of your report...are you positively sure that the shots did in fact cross? The hole on the left came from the right barrel and the hole on the right came from the left barrel? Yes, I am sure.
I only ask because I'm incredulous that Armbrust loads made custom to that gun would behave in such a drastically awful way. I could accept that a wide spread resulted, even though that would be terrible in its own way. I should have specified that the loads were made for this gun based on the proofs and that it is a 2.75" so the magnum loads seemed proper. Tom did not have the gun in hand as far as I know
Anyway, I would agree with sharps and try shooting them at longer ranges. I mean, what the hell, you've got the rounds, a few more shot through your barrels wouldn't require that much more cleaning...passing immediate judgement after just 2 shots at 25 yards and then "putting the old gal away" seems downright insulting to that beautiful old gal. IMO, it would be insulting to put any more of these rounds through the gun. They aren't going to magically converge out at 50 or 100yds so there will be nothing learned by such an exercise. I would rather work UP a load not work down... Honestly, it felt like shooting my 450/400 Jeffery Farq in the recoil department - a bit of a surprise.
Aren't you the least bit curious to know any further facts, even if they're not favorable? You're going to have to work up a regulated load for that wonderful gun sometime, or perhaps you can find someone who does such work for a fee if you're not set up to reload. But you've got to do the honorable thing and pursue regulating that Evans. Oh, I plan on getting it to shoot. That isn't the issue. The next step will be to contact Tom and send the leftover shells back to exchange for the lower velocity variant and see how it shoots then. Hopefully, I will be able to get a mold and load for myself. This will be more likely if it is in fact regulated for the lower velocity load.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,737
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,737 |
PM - Many Thanks. My main source of information for theseguns, other than the odd article or post over the years, is probably the Roger Lake PARADOX book, which, as you know, deals strictly with H & H so-named guns, which makes clear there were not many of these guns made in ANY gauge. Had no idea of the number of Westleys, etc., but knew they weren't abundant either. I've always maintained that on this site you can get the absolute best free education on all double/single guns. Your reply is a perfect example.
Huvius - I stand corrected on all points. Your initial report seemed so abrupt I didn't have a feel for what your plans were/are. I'll be patiently waiting on the sidelines until your eventual success, and what a grand day that will be.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
K.K., responses in blue. Sorry to appear doubtful of your report...are you positively sure that the shots did in fact cross? The hole on the left came from the right barrel and the hole on the right came from the left barrel? Yes, I am sure.
I only ask because I'm incredulous that Armbrust loads made custom to that gun would behave in such a drastically awful way. I could accept that a wide spread resulted, even though that would be terrible in its own way. I should have specified that the loads were made for this gun based on the proofs and that it is a 2.75" so the magnum loads seemed proper. Tom did not have the gun in hand as far as I know
Anyway, I would agree with sharps and try shooting them at longer ranges. I mean, what the hell, you've got the rounds, a few more shot through your barrels wouldn't require that much more cleaning...passing immediate judgement after just 2 shots at 25 yards and then "putting the old gal away" seems downright insulting to that beautiful old gal. IMO, it would be insulting to put any more of these rounds through the gun. They aren't going to magically converge out at 50 or 100yds so there will be nothing learned by such an exercise. I would rather work UP a load not work down... Honestly, it felt like shooting my 450/400 Jeffery Farq in the recoil department - a bit of a surprise.
Aren't you the least bit curious to know any further facts, even if they're not favorable? You're going to have to work up a regulated load for that wonderful gun sometime, or perhaps you can find someone who does such work for a fee if you're not set up to reload. But you've got to do the honorable thing and pursue regulating that Evans. Oh, I plan on getting it to shoot. That isn't the issue. The next step will be to contact Tom and send the leftover shells back to exchange for the lower velocity variant and see how it shoots then. Hopefully, I will be able to get a mold and load for myself. This will be more likely if it is in fact regulated for the lower velocity load.
The Westley Fauneta cartridge was 2 1/2" and I believe so are Armbrusts. As far as recoil being similar to your NE; that is par for the Fauneta load. The WR Super Magnum 12 is a bit stouter. Were you ever able to get a bore and choke diameter?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133 |
PM, the shells made up for the gun are 2 1/2" now that I look closer at them. Maybe I was mistaken on the chamber length...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 601
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 601 |
There's a new book on Bore Rifles coming out soon by Cal Pappas. He wrote the book about the 600 NE also. I'll ask him today if it's going to include any information about the paradox guns. I'll let you know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,463 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,463 Likes: 207 |
Not to take sides,just putting my 2 cents worth in. When I test a double rifle,I always shoot on two targets,side by side. I shoot one with the right(or under)barrel and shoot the other with the left(or over)barrel, just as quickly as I can get on target. Then I put one target on the other and mark the holes. This is the only way I can tell of the gun is crossing or shooting wide. If I shoot,check point of impact,then shoot the second barrel;then I have waited too long between shots.When shooting more than once from each barrel, I let the barrels cool to ambient temp.between each set of shots. This may not be as important for a double as a cape gun,but I do it just to be consistent. Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133 |
PM, the shells made up for the gun are 2 1/2" now that I look closer at them. Maybe I was mistaken on the chamber length... Well, the chambers are 2 3/4" as stamped on the underside of the barrels. Thought that was the case. So, a couple questions may be: are the 20 bore Paradox shells always 2.5" even in a gun chambered for 2.75" shells? Is the 2.75" chamber length to utilize the more powerful 2.75" 20 bore shot shells while keeping with the 2.5" paradox shells? Pic of the shells:
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 133 |
Again with the blue... ...I shoot one with the right(or under)barrel and shoot the other with the left(or over)barrel, just as quickly as I can get on target. Then I put one target on the other and mark the holes. This is the only way I can tell of the gun is crossing or shooting wide.
Why is shooting at one target not accomplishing the same thing? It isn't as thought the gun knows it is shooting at a different target and I would think that when shooting at the same target, the shooters hold,footing and posture is set rather than swinging slightly to another target.
If I shoot,check point of impact,then shoot the second barrel;then I have waited too long between shots...
What is too long? In the field, two shots aren't necessarily going to be snapped one right after the other so wouldn't it be more consistent to shoot each barrel with the same amount of preparation and control in order to see where it is really shooting one barrel compared to the other? Also, at 25yds, the point of impact of a 20 bore bullet is very obvious and takes only a second to determine with the naked eye.
|
|
|
|
|