|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,445
Posts544,827
Members14,406
| |
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1 |
Gipson was a wildcatter. He is mentioned in Fred Ness' "Practical Dope on the 22" and in Landis' books on "22 Caliber Varmint Rifles" and "Woodchucks and Woodchuck Rifles". Landis reported that Gipson was "president and co-owner of the Neidner Rifle Corporation". Is Landis correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
Gipson was a wildcatter. He is mentioned in Fred Ness' "Practical Dope on the 22" and in Landis' books on "22 Caliber Varmint Rifles" and "Woodchucks and Woodchuck Rifles". Landis reported that Gipson was "president and co-owner of the Neidner Rifle Corporation". Is Landis correct? About this time there were a lot of co-owners in the NRC how much Gipson had I've not been able to learn.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,083 Likes: 35
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,083 Likes: 35 |
Joe, I used some canned air and blew some dirt out of the Winchester scope but there is definitely what looks like a knot in the vertical wire, much the same as on the Weaver. I can't believe someone could tie a knot in that wire, if they went through that trouble why not just replace the wire?
Don't know if I can get a picture but will try.
Rob
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income.
- Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
Joe,
I purchased some scope wire from some one on one of the boards some time ago.
If I can find the contact information I will let you know. Not too hopeful but I may have it some place.
Cheers,
Laurie
Many thanks, Laurie, it looks like maybe more than one of us will need that info! Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Note the long eye relief on the 330. They could be mounted ahead of the bolt handle on 1903s and 1898s if you were a bit of a stock crawler. Ditto the first Weaver K2.5.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
And all the Noskes of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026 |
Rob, I'm trying to figure out the pedigree of that Enfield Martini. The left side reciever markings are clear except for the date: is it 1908 or 1903?
It was a .303 artillery carbine action when converted to .30-40.
Can you show or mention the RIGHT side markings?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,083 Likes: 35
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,083 Likes: 35 |
Mike, that's 1903, no marks at all on the right side.
The trigger guard is stamped 3 over 13, the lever has an upward pointing arrow, under that WD and under that 8 over 3.
BTW, JD was right about the scope on this one, dust bunny, not a knot. Some canned air took care of it. Still have what looks like a knot on the Winchester scope but must be some kind of dirt. Will have another look.
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income.
- Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026 |
Thanks, Rob. 1903 makes a lot more sense than 1908. I suspect that as the Lee Enfield became general issue all over the Empire, these Martinis became mainly the arms of colonial native paramilitary organizations: militia and police. A .303 Martini Enfield Artillery Carbine would have been a natural for a colonial police organization; many were so used, for a long time, all over the world.
|
|
|
|
|
