S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,518
Posts545,726
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 775
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 775 |
HoJo shows his ignorance again! No Belgian proofs, and Whitworth steel barrels show that this is not JABC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862 |
There are plenty of Birmingham guns out there marked "W Richards". It was a trade name, apparently used by Folsom. It's probable that Folsom started sourcing their guns from Belgium after the 1890 Tariff Act.
I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862 |
I have a W. Richards hammer gun, unusually good quality. What I find odd, is that the top rib is marked London, not Liverpool. Could this be a gun made for the US market?
I'd say you are correct. A London address was more desirable. That's why some makers had both London and Birmingham locations, to put London as the address. The proofs usually tell where it was made, but some guns were made in Birmingham and then sent to London to be proofed.
I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 339
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 339 |
No help, but I believe I would hang that one on the wall. JR
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I have both the Birmingham proofed W Richards as well as a Belgian proofed one. Though both are currently in poor condition the Birmingham proofed one is definitely a few cuts above the Belgian. The Belgian is a top lever gun & is probably a "Newer" gun than the Brit. Assuming the one with Brit proofs was built by Clabrough it is highly likely they sourced Belgian tubes for the barrels. Most else was more likely done in or around Birmingham. Some fairly low grade stuff was turned out here as well, though not generally as low as the lowest from Belgium. "London Laminated Steel" is not Whitworth. The pics here as well as my gun appear to be "Plain Twist" certainly not true "Laminated Steel" in the sense of that which had such high rankings in proof tests.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
There are plenty of Birmingham guns out there marked "W Richards". It was a trade name, apparently used by Folsom. It's probable that Folsom started sourcing their guns from Belgium after the 1890 Tariff Act. Ken, "W. Richards" was the tradename of William Richards of Preston and Liverpool. He seems to have "done nothing" to discourage the confusion between his name and the "Westley Richards" name. Whether or not he was involved in the use of "W. Richards" by Belgian maker(s) is not, at this time, known. At least, he was unable to stop this use, to his mark's considerable detriment. It appears that he was a maker in the true sense. Likely he bought in work from the trade, as did most (if not all), finished gun makers. W. Richards of Preston/Liverpool (he had shops in both and used both locations) is/should be a well respected name. W. Richards of Belgium is generally low quality. DDA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96 |
There were a few W. Richards listed in London but were long gone before your gun would have been made. William Richards (no relation to Westley Richards) traded at Liverpool and Preston. The name still lives on in Yorkshire http://wrichardsguns.co.uk/history.html and the records are pretty well complete. He will tell you that the business had absolutely nothing to do with spurious guns made in Belgium which were sent to the U.S.A. in large numbers (rarely encountered here in the U.K.). I think they were trying to trade on the more famous Westley Richards. I think you will find that your W. Richards gun, purporting to be made in London, may also be someone trying to trade in the more famous name. Guns by Wm. Moore and Greener were also forged to some degree. Get in touch with W. Richards at the link above and see but I think that it is unlikely to appear in their records. Not to say there is anything wrong with the gun in itself as it no doubt went through the proof house o.k. at some time. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 315
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 315 |
Lefaucheaux Action W. Richards with Belgian proof Side lever W. Richards with Birmingham proof Crescent W. Richards Norwich, Conn. Louis Muller W. Richards, Belgium Toplever W. Richards, Birmingham Proof
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
And they all look like junk....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 315
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 315 |
Miller is correct; the barrels are Twist.
Could the OP please clarify the barrel marks. LP? LLH overstamped with HB?
|
|
|
|
|