The link you provide makes the claim of "substantial gain in pattern density" I note they fail to provide actual statistics. Either in what exact changes they are suggesting to what current forcing cone angle and length.
Gladys, I mean old colonel, is this statement above one sentence, or is it two... or perhaps three???
And could you please provide an intelligible English translation for the following statement?
A.C. Jones' work where he does provide data and does not corroborate their claims. He in fact holds the gain is negligible.
I won't be offering any disingenuous blessings to you today Gladys. Disingenuous blessings are your forte. BTW, did you know that Ed is an anti-gunner? That's why I won't be responding to his silly question about forcing cones. I don't help those who advocate disarming law abiding U.S. citizens, as Ed Good does.
as for the gun control issue...we are the only country in the world that seems to tolerate mass murder, in the name of an individual right...its about time that we as a society realize that we are over gunned with too many super dangerous weapons in the hands of too many super dangerous people... it is long past time to do as the rest of the civilized world has done and simply, disarm...
I'm going outside now to cut grass and do some yard work. You have 8 hours or so to come up with a clever reply. Lot's of luck!