A Darne waterfowler-or, close. - 03/20/16 10:20 PM
A lot of Darnes are built fairly light, no doubt aimed for those who will typically be involved in "rough shooting", often for more than one species, with lots of walking. My "Big" 12 to this point has been a short barreled 12 that weighs 6 lbs, 1oz wearing it's sling. The others are under 6 lbs.
This one is a bit different. It is a bit heavier than 7 lbs, with 27" barrels, proofed at 18.2mm or, about .716, and really tight chokes, .701 in the right tube, and .685 in the left. Call it, IMP MOD and EX FULL. Chambers are 2 3/4". The wall thickness seems to float between .065 and .100, depending on where you measure it. There is no export info stamped on the barrels. I'm guessing it is early 1950s, and the gun wears sling swivels, typical for a European home market gun from that era.
It feels massive compared to my other Darnes. Note the treatment to the front wood, with the rounded cheeks usually seen on graded R model guns. I'm guessing a European hunter ordered this gun, but, it doesn't seem like he got much of a chance to use it. It still has it's original horsey hoove buttplate, that time has shrunken a bit.
How it ended up here is anyone's guess. I can trace it as far back as the late Don Thompson in the mid 1980s, a dealer who used to come to the larger gun shows here in the midwest.
I own it now.
After a bit of maintenance at my workbench (it is filthy, and full of dried up grease and oil) I'm going to give it a try at trap-I don't hunt ducks.
Heavy walls, tight chokes.
Best,
Ted
This one is a bit different. It is a bit heavier than 7 lbs, with 27" barrels, proofed at 18.2mm or, about .716, and really tight chokes, .701 in the right tube, and .685 in the left. Call it, IMP MOD and EX FULL. Chambers are 2 3/4". The wall thickness seems to float between .065 and .100, depending on where you measure it. There is no export info stamped on the barrels. I'm guessing it is early 1950s, and the gun wears sling swivels, typical for a European home market gun from that era.
It feels massive compared to my other Darnes. Note the treatment to the front wood, with the rounded cheeks usually seen on graded R model guns. I'm guessing a European hunter ordered this gun, but, it doesn't seem like he got much of a chance to use it. It still has it's original horsey hoove buttplate, that time has shrunken a bit.
How it ended up here is anyone's guess. I can trace it as far back as the late Don Thompson in the mid 1980s, a dealer who used to come to the larger gun shows here in the midwest.
I own it now.
After a bit of maintenance at my workbench (it is filthy, and full of dried up grease and oil) I'm going to give it a try at trap-I don't hunt ducks.
Heavy walls, tight chokes.
Best,
Ted