|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
3 members (SXS 40, Jtplumb, 1 invisible),
854
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,527
Posts545,850
Members14,420
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
Re: the sleeving problem
#638488
Dec 3rd a 10:28 AM
|
by Parabola |
Parabola |
Gough Thomas in the 1975 3rd Edition of Shotguns and Cartridges for Game/and Clays wrote:- “and of all the British shotgun barrels passing through the Birmingham Proof House last year some 57 per cent were sleeved”.
He was writing when the price of sleeving was less than the value of the sleeved gun.
It would be interesting to know the present percentage.
At present prices of sleeving it has to be a very good gun (or treasured heirloom) indeed to make economic sense.
|
|
|
|
|