doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Texas Judge Strikes Down Part of the 1968 GCA

http://townhall.com/columnists/bobbarr/2...ndment-n1958657

However: IMO; this will be a short victory if H, Clinton is elected.
Jim

Very interesting article Jim. And especially since the implementation of the NICS (National Instant Check System), any Federally licensed firearms dealer has the same ability to verify whether a purchaser may legally buy a firearm, no matter where the transaction takes place.

No surprise that the Government is expected to appeal this decision. I hope everyone took notice of the answers given by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the last debate pertaining to the type of Federal and Supreme Court Judges they would nominate.

Hillary Clinton never even mentioned respect for the U.S. Constitution as a qualification for Judges. And we all know she has no respect for our Constitutional 2nd Amendment Rights.

This election will set the tone in the United States for the next several decades. And if the "democrats" prevail It doesn't bode well for the U S Constitution in general and the 2nd Amendment in particular. Anyone watching the last debate clearly heard Clinton state "I support the 2nd Amendment". This is in stark contrast to her previously recorded statements or statements caught made her aides. Actually she can state that she supports the 2nd Amendment and MEAN just like they do in NYC or Washington DC by making it as difficult and expensive as possible to get approval to purchase and own a firearm. Keep in mind that the $200 transfer stamp to transfer a full automatic was a hefty expense in 1934 when many working Americans didn't make that much in a Month. I would envision substantial transfer or purchase costs tacked on to every firearms transaction as a first step if the "democrats" get control. Of course "Universal Registration" even though it was demonstrated to be unworkable in Canada will become the law of the land.
Jim

Some would argue that threatening to use the executive branch of the government to jail one's political opponent's shows an even higher disregard for the US constitution.

Yes, a complete idiot (Libtard) would make such an argument by refusing to consider that Hillary broke the law by keeping highly classified secrets on an unsecured personal server, and by destroying evidence by using BleachBit to erase e-mails, and smashing Blackberries with a hammer to destroy evidence after a Congressional subpoena had been served on her. Influence peddling by the Clinton Foundation is just more criminal activity that should be investigated by a Special Prosecutor, along with Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with Evidence, and Lying Under Oath.



If Donald Trump really did break the law, I think any sane person would demand that he be punished for his crime, and jailed. It is not a disregard for the Constitution to demand that the law be followed. It is a disregard for the Constitution to ask that anyone, no matter who or what their position, should be above the law.

I think the feingold/WI senate race email leaks demonstrate best what you're having a hard time expressing. Two days ago, it's shown that he's on board with hill to take on more gun control through the exec branch. But hey, he's another true patriot, slashing all barriers to spending other folks' money. So, he's a good 'un, eh?

Yep, one of the better ones he is.

There you go, you done hurt my feelings. I suspected, but are you confirming that he identifies as a male?

Sorry you just can't accept the conclusions of the people and agencies that conducted the investigation in the emails, Benghazi,and what not. Just seems that you prefer vigilantism over the rule of law, which hey, kinda of supports why your blindly support Drumph.

How many investigations has Clinton gone through without nothing to show for in terms of criminal charges being introduced? ZERO! Tens of millions of wasted taxpayers money.

So don't continue to lie and come across as being pro-constitution cause you girls sure as sh!t are not when the rule of law results in an outcome you don't like.

How's your Russian BTW? It seems you boy doesn't even want to believe intelligence briefings now that its clear his Russian masters are working to influence our democratic process to favor Drumph.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/natio...1014-story.html

Sure hope there is no clear evidence of collusion as that would be treason. There is only one punishment for treason.

No, just educated. A trait that is difficult for you to pick up on.