Originally Posted by craigd
Originally Posted by BrentD, Prof
....Looked at rationally, lead is a big and immediate threat to condors. This is extremely well documented....
Looked at rationally, how do your facts extrapolate to a hunting lead projectile ban across the entire state? I have no interest in your brand of entertainment, just connect the dots between science, agendas, and law.

Are you complaining about the science or the law? They are not the same thing. You want to rail about bad science, corrupt science - prove it. That's a very objective process.



Quote
Seriously, can you cut through the hypocrisy and do your part by example? Hasn't the california condor been found in New Mexico, not far from Raton? What's your nonlead mono metal load for your late 1800's Ballard moose rifle? Have you destroyed your lead bullet casting molds, so that they never again contribute to environment lead contamination, or have you sold them, for your monetary gain and allow someone else to damage wildlife? No, you're keeping the lead bullet casting molds? Have a good stash of pristine 20:1, 30:1 casting lead, both and more? So, you shoot for a whole month down at Raton, what's that add up to, two, three hundred pounds of lead added to the edge of kalicondor range, or does the science say you get a pass in your mind because of the way you vote?


My moose rifle has never hunted in Condor country. Sorry about that, but if you claim otherwise, that's just another "alternative fact" that you have made up out of thin air. Shooting targets is not a danger to condors. Are you claiming that it is? You are, as always, failing to be rational and continually moving goal posts. But carry on. What's next? I can hardly wait while your knickers become more and more knotted. If only Stan could join you...

_________
BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]