Here's the problem Keith. "You will learn that here on the internet, you can pretend to be whatever you want to be" only applies to those who cowardly hide behind internet anonymity. Those with the
cojones to reveal their identiy, like Larry, and Michael, and Greg, and King, and many others here, EVEN ed, don't have that choice, and likely are more careful with their words, and insults.
Please save us the smart azz come back claiming to be someone you are not. Sorta sounds like jaeger doesn't it? Or whining about being personally attacked. Or JamesM delusional paranoia that you are being threaten.
And BTW: those who continually insult other adult males suggesting they are behaving like women, or are F.A.G.s, frequently have some gender identity conflict with self-loathing projection.
P.S. You can find my home phone and address at the bottom here. I can't hide like you, and I am neither a liar nor a coward
http://www.picturetrail.com/homePage/gracemedicalmissionsI suppose I could have given Drew the last word here, but there is so much unadulterated bullshit in this one short post that it screams for a reply.
Drew, you said, "
"Please save us the smart azz come back claiming to be someone you are not."Drew, please show us exactly where I have ever claimed to be something I'm not.
Drew, you are once again going on about your moral superiority for posting under your full name. For years, you posted under a screen name, as do most intelligent gun collectors. Many here besides myself still do. You made the stupid choice to change, and now wish to belittle anyone who isn't as dumb. If any thieves or crackheads ever decide to make a home invasion attack on your premises because you are stupid enough to post your interest and collecting of guns under your full name, I hope you are home alone. I believe you have endangered your family in your vain attempt at moral superiority.
You make a good point about posting under our full names, but once again shoot down your own argument, just as you did in your heart-wrenching "Down One" thread back in 2016.
Drew's Heart Wrenching Personal Attack "Down One" thread I still laugh when I think about that thread Drew. You framed it around some deadly dangerous medical mission trip to Guatemala, and spoke about the horrible spiritual warfare you were enduring as you mentally prepared for it. You made it sound like God was calling Moses when you told us about the "eternal significance" of your personal attack on JamesM, Dave K., and me.
As it turned out, your big dangerous Medical Mission trip to Guatemala turned out to be about a 4 1/2 day trip... little more than a long weekend. Take out travel time, and it looks like little more than a fund raising tax shelter to me. But that's just my opinion. Now my neighbor went on a Religious Mission trip last year and spent two months helping African natives. And he never bragged about it or used it as a framework for personal attacks. I hope you get a nice income tax break for your grueling ministry. But other than that short absence, you never really left this forum, as you had disingenuously stated. You were logged in virtually every day to read your thread and to see who was fawning over you, and sympathetic to you. That's pathetic.
Up until that time, your Tag Line at the bottom of every post was:
"Personal attacks only reflect the inadequacy of the argument, and the character of the attacker."
I repeatedly asked you about the hypocrisy of making a personal attack on us while you used that Tag Line. You couldn't give us an answer, and instead, you changed your Tag Line. Smooth move there Reverend.
You made the plaintive argument that by posting under our full names, we would be more civilized, and less likely to launch into personal attacks. But just as you did in this idiotic post, you shot yourself in the foot by making a personal attack on JamesM. You know Jim personally. You know his full name. You hunted with him and socialized with him and his wife. Yet that didn't stop you from making your personal attacks on him, right up to the time he left this forum.
jOe realized that this is another hypocritical personal attack by you, and he also saw right through that filthy lie about Jim:
An attack by a preacher whats the world coming to ?
Ps...James gave up on this place because of the socialist liberals that are allowed to run rampant on here.
But you had also made personal attacks on Run With The Fox even though you knew his name and where he lived. Your Bro Larry made personal attacks on Francis even though he knew he was a combat veteran. No complaints or whining from crybaby Gregory about that personal attack on a military veteran. Go figure.
I repeatedly asked you about the personal attacks you were making then, while you made your disingenuous case for posting under full names. You never replied. You also made the false and dishonest statement that I had "Proof texted Scripture." I repeatedly asked you where I did that, and again, you couldn't reply or show us without admitting that it was another falsehood from the Preacher.
It wasn't enough that you and your fellow Liberal F.A.G.'s succeeded in driving Jim (JamesM) away. You still continue your personal attacks on him even now... even though you know his full name. Worse yet, you are resorting to lies to denigrate him by accusing him of delusional paranoia. Jim specifically told us why he became disgusted with this place. jOe remembers why, as do lots of other guys. But that didn't stop you from accusing him of "delusional paranoia". It seems that your personal attacks on Jim are continuing even when he isn't here to defend himself. Now do you see why you are called Fake Ass Gentlemen?
That sounded a lot like another time when Jim took a break from posting, and your Libtard pal King Brown kept lying by saying Jim had exhorted us to kill his one of his anti-gun Liberal Left heroes, George Soros, and lied even further by saying that Jim had contacted Connecticut police about Newtown and that he was under "emotional strain."
King was asked to prove those false statements and personal attacks, but was predictably silent, choosing to fade away and change the subject. That's why I almost choked when you listed him among the virtuous and righteous ones who post under their full name. King has shown me that he is perhaps the single most dishonest guy to ever post here. He has been shown to flat out lie and post false data on many many occasions to advance his Liberal Left anti-2nd Amendment and Socialist dogma. Hell, the guy can even deny ever seeing any anti-gun sentiment posted here, even when his lying nose is shoved into a quote from Ed Good saying that the U.S. has too many dangerous guns and it is time to disarm.
I also got a kick out of you attempting to twist my words once again, and sneaking in another personal attack in the process. It was very dishonest of you to attempt to suggest I have some gender identity conflict by comparing guys who pretend to IGNORE me to a menstruating woman. That is exactly what they act like. But you went further to twist the acronym F.A.G.s into something else. Each time I used that acronym in this thread, I followed it with (Fake Ass Gentlemen). I then went on to specifically explain it, and its' origin, to dhanks. But fraud that you are, you still had to twist it to suggest that I might have gender identity issues. What a stand-up guy you are Drew! Actually, I think that may be your problem since you feel the need to repeatedly tell us about your "cajones", and the acronym F.A.G.'s seems to really hit a nerve in you. Do you take it personally when you see a Doughboy in an old movie about WWI referring to a cigarette as a fag?
Then you go on by once again telling us that you are not a coward, and that I can look you up and even call your phone number. You told us that you aren't a liar, but you've shown us otherwise. Is the notice that I can call you and find you some weak testosterone laden call-out? Do you want me to call you and threaten you? What exactly are you trying to prove?
During your fake "Down One" absence, I received a PM from a member here that you consider one of your "Bro's". I still have it. He told me that he'd like to see you return to the forum, but was concerned that I'd launch an attack on you. I assured him that I would do no such thing unless you personally attacked me. After my reply to him, you returned within minutes, so I assume he relayed my words to you. Since that time, I've specifically avoided conflict with you. We recently sparred a bit over my belief that SSRI drugs may be a contributing factor to mass shootings, but it remained quite civil. But now it looks as if you'd like to resume your disingenuous and dishonest personal attacks. As you wish. At least you won't have to worry about getting criticized by your fellow F.A.G.'s and Thread Police. They likely won't be squealing to Dave calling for censorship either.
