Originally Posted By: King Brown
Well and happy....
....Your "likely not" SC scenario reminds it stopping 2000 Florida recount that gave Bush victory, first in 112 years in which the winner failed to win the popular vote. Trump second.

Pity their SC is so politicized. I was shaken by an interview....

Why weren't you shaken by the current fellow's statement that he would nominate progressive legislators to the highest court, then kept his promise? Was it because the progress of pc is more important than the Constitution, law, and the content of character?

The Florida recount was never halted for a second, your media colleagues stuck it out in obscurity to the painfully truthful end in the hopes of a gotch'ya. The polling on that was disappointing, so it was never released.

Perhaps, history is repeating itself in Wisconsin? The multimillion dollar recount that could elevate scores out of poverty has netted hill twenty-five votes as of day ten. Maybe there's a corelation between the enthusiasm to 'report' this recount and Florida's?

The people have spoken. Apparently, you're so impressed with the content of Trump's policy and the quality of his transition, that trivial divisiveness dominates the 'conversation'?