S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
34
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,579
Posts546,667
Members14,425
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
Keith, I know who George Soros is and occasionally I'm sure I have seen his picture. But I didn't recognize him from the picture posted. Neither did jOe and neither did King. Big deal.
You didn't answer the question I posed. Where did King say he didn't know who Soros was? Stay on topic Keith, don't try to wiggle away! LOL
Last edited by canvasback; 01/25/15 07:07 PM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
Jeez, I guess jOe and I are libtards along with King, because I didn't recognize Soros from just the pic and neither did jOe. Maybe you didn't recognize his face but I'll bet the two of you recognized his name. Brown on the other hand is Notorious for having a very "selective" memory. Jim Jim, of course you are correct (speaking on behalf of jOe here). Hard to imagine any of us here not know who Soros is. However not recognizing him from one picture is a different thing and in my book, not a moral failing. King acknowledged he knew who Soros was in his first post once it had been made plain in the thread. Nowhere, in any post I have seen, does King suggest he doesn't know who Soros is. Not sure I would recognize Harry Reid....he doesn't appear on the news much up here. Yet I know full well what a dick he is. Again, not a moral failing.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
James: I have no idea what King Brown posts any more as he is on my ignore list. I gave him the opportunity to admit he was lying in a previous thread and stand up like a man. Therefore my comment regarding his "selective memory" was a general one and anyone who has read his drivil over the years knows what I was stating. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
He may well have won-or not,but he in no way was "preferred" by anything but the slimmest of margins over those who chose to go to the poll that Nov day. King why do you continue to ignore the House and the Senate as if it has no say in governing of my country ? BTW Obama has yet to say the words,nor anyone I can think of in his administration,"RADICAL ISLAM"
Last edited by Dave K; 01/25/15 09:08 PM.
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Dave: I believe virtually everyone who can think now knows that Obama is a closet Muslim. He was born and raised as a Muslim and if he were to attack Islam he'd be attacking his own roots and beliefs. He has lied and cheated his way through the past 6 years with the aide of a compliant "mainsteam news media". Also lest we forget; That scumbag Soros funded Obama's 2008 campaign by funneling small but large numbers of contributions thru Africa. He has done what he can to tear down American responsible society with Obamacare and his latest insult "Free 2 year college tuition". Guess who the hell would end up paying for this free tuition? Can anyone spell American taxpayers! Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890 |
Obama won the first election because the liberal media refused to vet him properly in their delirious enjoyment over the first potential black president. They covered for him in the second election even to the extent of having a moderator interrupt Romney to defend Obama (unheard of by a presidential debate moderator)as Obama was floundering and Romney was moving in for the finishing jab. If the media had acted responsibly and done their job in the first election, it is doubtful if Obama would have won. The WH, aided by the media, shielded and stonewalled on so many scandals in his first term in order to win the 2nd election. If the truth ever comes out(and I pray it does) concerning the IRS, Benghazi, Veteran's administration, Fast & Furious and probably a baker's dozen more nefarious schemes that have not come to light, Obama and his entire administration (a lot of people)will be found to have engaged in numerous crimes up to and including felonies. Most of the democrats in congress are neck deep themselves in the IRS intimidation scandal. They were so scared of losing their seat to a Tea Party candidate. The Corruption-in-Chief lost the house due to Tea Party influence and the Senate by the widest margin in memory mainly because the public no longer allowed themselves to be shilled by a propagandist, cheerleader media that is as corrupt as his administration.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
Obama won the first election because the liberal media refused to vet him properly in their delirious enjoyment over the first potential black president. They covered for him in the second election even to the extent of having a moderator interrupt Romney to defend Obama (unheard of by a presidential debate moderator)as Obama was floundering and Romney was moving in for the finishing jab. If the media had acted responsibly and done their job in the first election, it is doubtful if Obama would have won. The WH, aided by the media, shielded and stonewalled on so many scandals in his first term in order to win the 2nd election. If the truth ever comes out(and I pray it does) concerning the IRS, Benghazi, Veteran's administration, Fast & Furious and probably a baker's dozen more nefarious schemes that have not come to light, Obama and his entire administration (a lot of people)will be found to have engaged in numerous crimes up to and including felonies. Most of the democrats in congress are neck deep themselves in the IRS intimidation scandal. They were so scared of losing their seat to a Tea Party candidate. The Corruption-in-Chief lost the house due to Tea Party influence and the Senate by the widest margin in memory mainly because the public no longer allowed themselves to be shilled by a propagandist, cheerleader media that is as corrupt as his administration. I couldn't agree more!
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,359 Likes: 399
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,359 Likes: 399 |
You didn't answer the question I posed. Where did King say he didn't know who Soros was? Stay on topic Keith, don't try to wiggle away! LOL James, you know I don't try to wiggle away from anything. King absolutely did not say he didn't know who Soros was. I have no problem admitting that. I also never said he actually said that. He said he did not recognize the photo of Soros, and while I might believe it if ed good or some other Low Information Democrat apologist said it, I do not believe it coming from our resident compulsive liar. When Last Dollar told us he had no idea who Soros was, I absolutely believed him because he had strong opinions on things he knew nothing about. Another Low Information voter, now gone fishing. I stand by my opinion and my belief that the extreme Liberal King has seen more than one crude pencil sketch of the Uber-Socialist who funds so many of his favorite causes and anti-gun Democrat politicians. Do you have any comment on King Brown being outraged at the thought that someone might suggest killing a traitorous Nazi collaborator like Socialist Soros, but having no comment on the many blacks and black leaders who expressed or incited death threats which led to the actual killings of U.S. Police Officers? Or would you prefer to let that little hypocrisy go unchallenged? And surely you noticed how, even when King Brown admitted to knowing of him, he cherry-picked what he knew and supported, and stayed far away from his vehement Anti-Gun activities. He didn't go near his backing of Move-On.org, the Obama campaign, the U.N. Small Arms Treaty, and the recent revelation that he poured over 33 million into inciting racial uprisings in the U.S. Again, where is King's outrage at Soros' funding of unrest that led to the killings and death threats of Police Officers? Then King deftly tried, once again, to equivocate and transfer Soros' support of Liberal causes to those of the Koch brothers and other wealthy donors who donate to both Republicans and Democrats in order to cover their bases. Yet he did not show us where Soros ever once contributed to anything but the most radical Leftist causes or candidates, nor did he show us where the Koch brothers contributed to Left wing Democrats. He tried to portray David Koch as a Conservative Republican who "swings both ways"... no double entendre intended... when he is a well known Libertarian who actually ran for President on the Libertarian ticket. As a Libertarian, he may well vocally support some non-Conservative issues like gay marriage or pulling all U.S. troops from foreign excursions, but I don't see where he actually funded gay marriage initiatives. This was just classic King Brown... constantly defending the anti-2nd Amendment Liberal Left Socialists whenever he can, and steering the conversation away from what they are actually doing to the country. If you wish to drink the King Brown Kool-Aid, I can't stop you. But don't ask me to pretend I don't see what he is and why he spends so much time here.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,758 Likes: 30
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,758 Likes: 30 |
King what is your opinion of abortion ; are you pro life or pro choice?
Brian LTC, USA Ret. NRA Patron Member AHFGCA Life Member USPSA Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,758 Likes: 30
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,758 Likes: 30 |
I am not an apologist for anything he's done. Making a billion on a British treasury mistake is small change, however, compared to what New York financiers did to America and overseas in the deepest recession of which the world is barely in half-recovery, and Big Oil threatening another with the world awash in oil.
As for altruism---always a suspect word for me---he is said to have contributed $7 billion to education, health and other "progressive" causes. Conservative philanthropists are generous with their money as well. making a Billion on an British Treasury mistake is an extreme understatement of what he did and what he almost did to the British economy. I want to know what "little oil" is. If we have Big Oil we must have "Little Oil" also. Are they not as bad? If "he is said to have contributed $7 billion to education, health and other "progressive" causes" well then , Hitler spent billions on education, health and other causes so I guess he shouldn't be ridiculed either. If you want to trivialize what Soros did "compared to what New York financiers did to America and overseas in the deepest recession of which the world is barely in half-recovery," then you are open to the comparison between Hitler's spending/ causes and Soros causes/programs/agenda. After all, Hitler had the German peoples best interests at heart. We wont focus on his negatives, just what he did to bring back the German economy , the morale of the country, nationalism, world standing. etc. Cant have your cake and eat it too!!!
Last edited by Brian; 01/26/15 05:02 PM.
Brian LTC, USA Ret. NRA Patron Member AHFGCA Life Member USPSA Life Member
|
|
|
|
|