|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (Lloyd3, 1 invisible),
601
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,563
Posts546,359
Members14,423
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
That is beautiful! Krags are handsome rifles in military dress but my do they clean up nice.
Jerry Liles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25 |
Thanks, Michael, for posting pictures. I studied this rifle on the internet for two or three days before I recognized what I was seeing. Photos showed just a hint of the small wedge of checkering behind the receiver tang. Once I noticed that, I realized I'd never seen a Sedgley Krag before. It turns out to be quite a nice rifle, aside from the Pacific peep sight. If anyone has a picture of another Sedgley Krag, it would be nice to be able to compare them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1 |
Bill, I believe I have a Lyman 48 base for a Krag, Yours for the shipping if you want it. I will check to be sure.
I learn something every day, and a lot of times it's that what I learned the day before was wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,147 Likes: 204
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,147 Likes: 204 |
Sure makes my Stoeger Krag look a bit crude.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,163 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,163 Likes: 25 |
just out of curiosity, is this a Jaeger Krag?, it looks the bottom of the cheekpiece is similar to Jaeger rifles, but not the top. Jaeger Krag? sorry to steer this slight off topic
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25 |
I don't think this could be a Jaeger job. The lines are classic Sedgley, including the schnabel, the somewhat long grip, and the Winchester buttplate. Inside the stock is a stamp HV. Otherwise there aren't marks to indicate whose work it is.
Bill Ferguson
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 621
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 621 |
Bill: Easy enough to determine. Jaeger rifles have the initials of the stockmaker Fritz R Voigt and the number for the month and year made [FRV 3-65 for March 1965] under the buttplate or recoil pad. Your Friend and Vegas Rounder Jerry p.s. Mindy says Howdy! http://www.germanhuntingguns.com/Sections/Page.asp?SSID=476&NRID=1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,025 Likes: 25 |
Jerry, Thanks for the tip. There are no markings under the buttplate. The front sight and barrelband are classic Sedgley details too. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 141
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|