Originally Posted By: Claybird
I have said this before in at least one other thread. I don't understand the reluctance to establishing a US proof house - let me emphasize on a voluntary basis, i.e. not by government dictation.

There are so many safety issues that can be resolve by "proof testing."

Seems to me it would be a good "business opportunity."


I understand the reluctance to establishing a US proof house, as others have noted, we don't need any more government oversight. Look at what the British and European governments have done on the business of gun ownership and regulation. As an American, I can't buy into it. To presume that it will remain voluntary is naive, IMO.