|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,581
Posts546,696
Members14,425
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 171
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 171 |
I am in need of help in finding the US Tariff passed in the late 1880,s that placed a tariff on English guns and foriegn barrels. I know the result was to give US makers a better chance of selling nice guns. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
McKinley was the chap responsible if memory serves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444 |
Interesting, I would never have thought of guns as needing or benefitting from protectionism and a non-free trade market.
Brent
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986 |
Don't hesitate to give your Congressional Rep. a call if you want a copy. That's one of the things they are there for...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
The tariff never specified English goods.
The McKinley Tariff was originally passed to protect the American farmer. If you read his original speech given in Congress that is obvious. It never achieved this goal. It did set off a series of "tariff wars" that raged in Congress for almost 40 years. These varied in their impact on the trans-Atlantic gun trade. Completed guns suffered the most.
It is interesting to note that the .410 was developed in England, but did not appear here until 1915. Perhaps a direct result of Woodrow Wilson's election and his efforts to take the tariff's apart.
On the flip side, because European firearms where artifically more expensive, many small firearms companies were created here. Not the least of which are names like Lefever, Fox, Parker, LC Smith, etc. Many of whom were able to import barrels and other parts of European manufacture because the tariff treated them more kindly than an assembled firearm. During this period we have examples of European firms licensing American patents and producting the guns for their market, but few examples of the reverse.
Pete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 171
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 171 |
Thanks , You guys know your history better than this old PE teacher. I printed a good deal of it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
The Tariff put a lot of export reliant English firms on the downward spiral. Many never fully recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
The Tariff put a lot of export reliant English firms on the downward spiral. Many never fully recovered. Interesting point. I have no doubt you are correct. I have paid more attention to American-Belgian trade relationship during this period. For my education, could you name one or two firms so impacted? I would imagine there was a ripple through out the production chain in England eventually impacting the steel industry in some degree. Pete
|
|
|
|
|
|