June
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Who's Online Now
9 members (Bob La Londe, Kolar Dickson, canvasback, NCTarheel, Jimmy W, 1 invisible), 512 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,577
Posts546,580
Members14,424
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
In the process of putting sights on my Alex Henry, my thought was to make the sights so that a line from the top of the rear sight to the top of the front sight resulted in a parallel line with the bore center line. Checking the original rifle in the shop to confirm this, I find that the front sight on the original rifle (top of rear to top of front) is .160" lower as measured from the bore center line. Rear standing leaf is marked "100", and no alterations are apparent. This dimensional disparity seems logically excessive. Anyone care to measure up their AH sights? What am I missing?
Thanks in advance for your observations.

Jim

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
LRF Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
Jim,
So you are saying that the line of sight crosses the line of bore to an angular extent of .160" over the sight radius. Am I reading that right. If right then you could calculate the angle knowing the sight radius and then check against the ballistic tables.
I haven't shot Black Powder rifles for some time but my foggy memory tells me that for every one hundrea yardds of distance the sight increased by about .100". Again this is highly dependant on SR and my thought are of tang sights with 30 to 32" barrels.
By the way Hi and hope you are doing well.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
Lynn,
Sorry for not being clear. Put another way, the sight-line of the original rifle is shooting downhill with respect to the bore line.
The chambering is .450 3 1/4. Distance between the sights is 20".
Jim

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
LRF Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
Hmmmmm....strange
Got to ask, sights are original? Any chance someone modified them sometime in the past?
Can you post pics of them, might stir some thought.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,466
Likes: 213
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,466
Likes: 213
I believe what Jim mentioned sounds right, kinda. Isn't the sight-line supposed to look, not shoot, downhill. And, the bore shoot or point uphill compared to where the sights are 'looking'.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 22
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 22
The front sight would have to be lower to counter the effects of gravity over a specified distance. If it were level, ie. parallel to the bore, holdover would obscure the target. See the front sight height caculator in a Brownells catalogue for the basic idea. The variance sounds about right to me for the given caliber.

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
LRF Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
Jim,
What is the height of the front sight to the bore and the height of the rear to bore?

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
LRF Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
Jim,
A 300 gr 45 bullet using nominal inputs would have a drop of ~9.9" in 100 yards. Your sight difference is .16" and that equates to 9.6" at 100 yards. (using the 20" SR)
I guess the confusion is, which is higher over the line of the bore, the rear or the front sight. If the rear then every thing looks correct; however if the front is higher then the bullet would impact about 20" low.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
"What is the height of the front sight to the bore and the height of the rear to bore?"

Top of front sight to center line of bore: .665"
Top of rear sight to center line of bore: .838"

As mentioned previously, the front sight is the small (hard to see for old folks) typical AH bead which fits in a long dovetail following the barrel axis. While all the front bases and sights look identical in Winfer's book, it could be that they actually used a variety of sight heights depending on the application.



Rear sight. All appears original but unknown is how much if any was taken off the top of this sight in regulation.
Giving much faith to A.H. that the gun shot reasonably when completed, I have redone the bases to reflect the respective height differences and will find out Saturday at the range what is going on.....the disparity still seems excessive to me.
Here are the new sights.






Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
LRF Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 83
The .173" delta between front and rear, with the rear higher seems about correct. My previous cal was with the bullet MV at 2000 fps when in reality 1700 for BP is closer. So the .173 seems right.
I have no idea why the front is so low and also do not think AH would have done it that way so I believe it has been messed with.

I like your front sight and for 100 yards with initial testing I would make the rear to be .200" high and then file in the notch until right on at the 100 yard distance.

Good shooting on Saturday, it will be a hoot I am sure.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.076s Queries: 35 (0.055s) Memory: 0.8518 MB (Peak: 1.9032 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-04 01:49:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS